1. PF Contest - Win "Conquering the Physics GRE" book! Click Here to Enter
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Frobenius Method for ODE

  1. Sep 23, 2009 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Use the Frobenius method, for an expansion about x=0, to find ONE solution of


    2. Relevant equations

    3. The attempt at a solution

    starting with an assumption of y1=[tex]\sum[/tex]anxn+r
    and plugging it into the ODE, i found


    i think this can be equated to:
    y=(-1/4)a0e2x/x, but when i plug it into the ODE it doesn't equal 0, and thus isn't a solution of the ODE, can anyone see where i've gone wrong?
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 24, 2009 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Welcome to PF!

    Hi zass! Welcome to PF! :smile:
    Difficult to say without seeing your full calculations, but did you take into account that the equations for n = 0 and 1 are usually different from the equations for general n?
  4. Sep 25, 2009 #3
    I think i accounted for it
    Here's my working out, maybe u can see if i've made a mistake:
    Using the initial assumption i've found u' and u'', then subbed them into the ode:
    [tex]\sum[/tex][tex]^{inf}_{n=0}[/tex](n+r)(n+r-1)anxn+r-2 + [tex]\sum[/tex][tex]^{inf}_{n=0}[/tex](n+r)anxn+r-2 + (1/4)[tex]\sum[/tex][tex]^{inf}_{n=0}[/tex]anxn+r-1 = 0

    Simplifying and collecting terms and sum:
    =[tex]\sum[/tex][tex]^{inf}_{n=1}[/tex]((n+r)(n+r-1)an + (n+r)an + (1/4)an-1)xn+r-2 + (0+r)(0+r-1)a0x0+r-2 + (0+r)a0x0+r-2 = 0

    Equating coefficients i found
    r2 = 0

    And thus the series now becomes
    n(n-1)an + nan + (1/4)an-1 = 0

    Which gives the recurrence formula:
    an = [tex]\frac{-an-1}{4n2}[/tex] , n=1,2,3,....inf

    then taking the first few terms i found
    an = a0/(n!)2
    and then just subbed back into the initial assumption made. I can't see anything wrong with what i've done :confused:
  5. Sep 25, 2009 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Hi zass! :smile:

    (have a sigma: ∑ and an infinity: ∞ and if you're using tex, ∞ is \infty, and sub and sup are _{} and ^{} :wink:)

    You've left out (-1/4)n

    does that make it ok?:smile:
  6. Sep 26, 2009 #5
    ah of course!! for some reason i thought that'd just be a constant.
    finally got a solution that fits :biggrin:
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook