From QED to Maxwell

  • #1
Ben Niehoff
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,879
161

Main Question or Discussion Point

I have some confusion as to how to get from the QED Lagrangian to ordinary electrodynamics. Beginning with the QED Lagrangian (density):

[tex]\mathcal L = \bar{\psi} (i\gamma^{\mu} D_{\mu} - m) \psi - \frac14 F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}[/tex]

I expand the covariant derivative [itex]D = \partial - iqA[/tex] to obtain

[tex]\mathcal L = \bar{\psi} i\gamma^{\mu} \partial_{\mu} \psi + q \bar{\psi} \gamma^{\mu} \psi A_{\mu} - m \bar{\psi} \psi - \frac14 F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}[/tex]

From here, one can either add a total divergence, or take the sum

[tex]\frac12 (\mathcal L + \mathcal L^{\dagger}) = \frac12 \bar{\psi} i \gamma^{\mu} \overleftrightarrow{\partial_{\mu}} \psi + q \bar{\psi} \gamma^{\mu} \psi A_{\mu} - m \bar{\psi} \psi - \frac14 F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}[/tex]

which I kinda like because it is more symmetrical. Anyway, using gauge invariance and Noether's theorem, we can get the conserved current

[tex]j^{\mu} = q \bar{\psi} \gamma^{\mu} \psi[/tex]

This couples to the EM field in the usual way,

[tex]\mathcal L = j^{\mu}A_{\mu} - \frac14 F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}[/tex]

But now the question is, how do I include the kinetic part of the Lagrangian? I would like to end up with something like

[tex]\mathcal L = m \sqrt{\dot x^{\mu} \dot x_{\mu}} + q \dot x^{\mu} A_{\mu} - \frac14 F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}[/tex]

but I can't seem to do anything with my current [itex]j^{\mu}[/itex] that resembles the kinetic part of the QED Lagrangian. The 4-divergence identically vanishes (by Noether's theorem), so the only scalar I can form is

[tex]j^{\mu} j_{\mu} = q^2 (\bar{\psi} \gamma^{\mu} \psi) (\bar{\psi} \gamma_{\mu} \psi)[/tex]

which I can't see how to simplify. Maybe I am missing something. Maybe what I am trying to do can't actually be done? Basically, I'd like to rewrite the QED Lagrangian in terms of [itex]j^{\mu}[/itex], and (hopefully) recover the classical Lagrangian. Any suggestions?

Edit:

Ah, I see one thing I can try. I might be able to make something of it by exploiting

[tex]i\partial_{\mu} = (i \partial_t, i \vec \nabla) = (E, - \vec p) = p_{\mu}[/tex]

I'll look into this later.
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Hans de Vries
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,089
23
But now the question is, how do I include the kinetic part of the Lagrangian? I would like to end up with something like

[tex]\mathcal L = m \sqrt{\dot x^{\mu} \dot x_{\mu}} + q \dot x^{\mu} A_{\mu} - \frac14 F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}[/tex]

Basically, I'd like to rewrite the QED Lagrangian in terms of [itex]j^{\mu}[/itex], and (hopefully) recover the classical Lagrangian. Any suggestions?

This is possible, but don't expect a square root. This is because we are
dealing with the Lagrangian density so all terms of the classical Lagrangian
pick up an extra gamma term due to the Lorentz contraction of the volume.

You can see this happening in equation 22.31 going to 22.32 here:

http://physics-quest.org/Book_Chapter_Lagrangian.pdf

You also might want to read section 22.3

Now, the kinetical part of the Lagrangian also represents quadratic terms
in the form of E^2 - p^2, because if you look at.

[tex] \frac12 \bar{\psi} i \gamma^{\mu} \overleftrightarrow{\partial_{\mu}} \psi [/tex]

then you see that [itex]\gamma^\mu[/itex] makes it a vector current {p0,px,py,pz} and the
derivative operating on the imaginary exponential then multiplies these
into a quadratic kinetic expression {p0^2-px^2-py^2-pz^2}


Regards, Hans
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Ben Niehoff
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,879
161
OK, that helps, but there is still the mass term

[tex]m \bar \psi \psi[/tex]

which I can't seem to do anything with. If psi is a plane wave

[tex]\psi = u(p,s) e^{-ip \cdot x}[/tex]

then I get

[tex]m \bar \psi \psi = m \bar u u = \frac{m^2}{E_p}[/tex]

leaving me with the Lagrangian

[tex]L = m \dot x^{\mu} \dot x_{\mu} - \frac{m^2}{E_p} + q \dot x^{\mu} A_{\mu} - \frac14 F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}[/tex]

However, the Lagrangian I ought to be able to get is

[tex]L = \frac12 m \dot x^{\mu} \dot x_{\mu} + q \dot x^{\mu} A_{\mu} - \frac14 F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}[/tex]

But here I'm not sure what to do. If I expand

[tex]\frac{m^2}{E_p} = \frac{m}{\sqrt{1 + \dot x^{\mu} \dot x_{\mu}}} = m \left( 1 - \frac12 \dot x^{\mu} \dot x_{\mu} + ... \right)[/tex]

then I get something that is close to what I need. But it doesn't make sense that I would have to make an expansion here...

Edit: Actually, that last line is wrong. I'll fix it in a bit.
 
  • #4
1,159
0
It seems to me that you have to try

[tex]
\psi => e^{-iS(x)}
[/tex]

as in the Hamilton-Jacoby approach.

Bob.
 
  • #5
970
3
Hamilton–Jacobi equations...


The solution I derived based upon the Hamilton–Jacobi equation, specifically the Eikonal approximation and relationship to the Schrödinger equation:

S represent the phase of a wave with unitless exponential argument:
[tex]\psi = \psi_{0} e^{\frac{iS}{\hbar}}[/tex]

Electrodynamic Lagrangian:
[tex]L = m \dot x^{\mu} \dot x_{\mu} - m \bar \psi \psi + q \dot x^{\mu} A_{\mu} - \frac14 F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}[/tex]

The Lagrangian mass term Lagrangian Hamilton–Jacobi Eikonal identity:
[tex]m \bar \psi \psi = m \bar u u = \frac{m^2}{E_p} = \frac{1}{2} m \dot x^{\mu} \dot x_{\mu}[/tex]

Lagrangian integration by substitution:
[tex]L = m \dot x^{\mu} \dot x_{\mu} - \frac{1}{2} m \dot x^{\mu} \dot x_{\mu} + q \dot x^{\mu} A_{\mu} - \frac14 F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}[/tex]

Electrodynamic Lagrangian solution:
[tex]\boxed{L = \frac{1}{2} m \dot x^{\mu} \dot x_{\mu} + q \dot x^{\mu} A_{\mu} - \frac14 F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}}[/tex]


Reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamilton's_equations#Eikonal_approximation_and_relationship_to_the_Schr.C3.B6dinger_equation"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6
Ben Niehoff
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,879
161


The Lagrangian mass term Lagrangian Hamilton–Jacobi Eikonal identity:
[tex]m \bar \psi \psi = m \bar u u = \frac{m^2}{E_p} = \frac{1}{2} m \dot x^{\mu} \dot x_{\mu}[/tex]
You lost me here. How do you establish the last equals sign? That's the crucial step.
 

Related Threads for: From QED to Maxwell

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
582
Replies
7
Views
436
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
3K
Top