offers very believable assertions about 911, The vids apear to support what is being said, so I ask why does the mainstream media not pick up on that? (To be continued)
Quotes from - What really happened site.Seismographs recorded seismic 'spikes' before WTC collapse debris hit the ground.
An eyewitness 6 blocks from the WTC heard explosions prior to each collapse.
A fireman's transcription of the New York Times 9/11 firefighters audio tape reveals an explosion prior to the collapse of WTC 2 was reported.
A video shows an object falling from WTC 1 followed by a camera shake. 14 seconds later WTC 1 collapses.
Construction steel has melting point of about 2,800° Fahrenheit (1535° Celsius), this temperature cannot be reached by jet-fuel burning in air, but molten steel was found in the basements of all of the collapsed WTC buildings.
Thermite is very exothermic. Temperatures above 4,500°F (2,500°C) are often reached. A byproduct of a thermite detonation in the WTC basements would be molten steel.
The service core of WTC 2 initially survived the collapse, but after a few seconds it also came to ground. This is consistent with molten iron from a thermite reaction pooling around the core columns, thus causing the collapse.
"If I were to bring the towers down, I would put explosives in the basement to get the weight of the building to help collapse the structure" - Mark Loizeaux, president of Controlled Demolition, Inc.
Are they saying there were explosions after the planes? Explosions that might have caused the collaspe? Is that where this 'Thermite' would have been involved?
I think you misread. Nothing in those quotes say thermite was found in the WTC.Originally posted by amp
Thermite? Whats that- duhhh ? How did it get in the basement of the WTC buildings?
All of the videos that show the collapse show it pancaking top to bottom.And that last statement eerie, in all those replays of the collapse did the bulidings start pancacking from the top or the bottom? After this much time has passed I don't quite recall also I didn't want to keep being reminded, but now that the shock has mostly subsided I wonder.
Yes, that is what they are saying.Are they saying there were explosions after the planes? Explosions that might have caused the collaspe? Is that where this 'Thermite' would have been involved?
No, there aren't any hard questions. You just need to learn to recognize B.S. when you see it. Most of those quotes are baseless speculation. The rest are in error.Basically, there are hard questions that need to be investigated...
Depends on how long before. Snapping beams could cause seismic readings and could begin a minute or two before the collapse.there wasn't anything to the report of an explosion just prior to the collapse or seismic monitors jumping ahead of the initial colapse.
I've never seen any such report and you can't take anything on that site at face value, so I submit that you likely haven't seen any such report either. If you have, it probably tells how it could happen.Can you explain the molten steel in the basements? Was the heat generated from the jet fuel and paper and other materials enough?
Could you read that question aloud to yourself a few times please? If you can't answer it yourself (indeed, the question IS the answer) and can't evaluate whether or not its a reasonable question, ask again.Originally posted by amp
Would thermite residue be found afterwards? Would it even be reported if there were an coverup?