... and perturbative quantum mechanics a la Feynman.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The free propagator is

[tex]K(1,2,t_1,t_2)=e^{i{(x_2-x_1)^2\over{t_2-t_1}}}[/tex]

but I find more insightful to write it as

[tex]K^{12}_t=e^{ip_{12} x_{12}}[/tex]

so I can see that it is unambiguously the product of momentum and displacement.

But when using it in a perturbative term with an interacting potential V

[tex]\int .. \int K^{1,2}_{t_{12}} V(x_2) K^{2,3}_{t_{23}} V(x_3).. V(x_{n-1}) K^{n-1,n}_{t_{n-1\; n}}}[/tex]

it could be better to separate [tex]x_{ij}=x_j-x_i[/tex] so that the interaction is composed of terms

[tex] V(x_7) e^{i {(p_{78}-p_{67}) x_7\over \hbar}}[/tex] or, generically, [tex] V(x_j) e^{i {(\Delta p_j}) x_j \over \hbar}}[/tex]

In this way we are half way to recover Newton's second law [tex]F= dp/dt[/tex], ie

[tex]V'(x_j) = {\Delta p_j \over \Delta t_j} [/tex]

At first glance it seems that there is some ambiguity to define the interval [tex]\Delta t_j[/tex]; a wider or narrower interval should give a different coupling constant. Guess one must examine the whole limiting procedure of the path integral to get the right value.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Fun with the free propagator

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - free propagator | Date |
---|---|

Free particle propagation: paradox? | Dec 6, 2015 |

Free particle propagator - Shankar POQM Eqn. 5.1.10, p. 153 | Nov 28, 2015 |

Propagator for free particle: question about Shankar formula | Nov 28, 2015 |

Nonrelativistic free particle propagators | Feb 1, 2015 |

Integral for the free propagator | Aug 4, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**