Functional variation of Lagrangian densities

  • Thread starter Cinquero
  • Start date
  • #1
31
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Why do we treat a scalar field phi and its derivatives as being independent when trying to find a stationary solution for the action?

Doesn't that give too general solutions?

Where does the restriction that (d_mu phi) is dependent on phi come back in?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
dextercioby
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,977
540
That's the idea. We take things as general as possible. The Lagrangian needs to be a function of positions and velocities treated as independent variables as to allow the passing to the Hamiltonian formalism on one hand and account for the correct description of dynamics on the other. I mean we usually see the lagrangian as the KE-PE function and the KE part involves time derivatives of position (generalized velocities), while the PE part is allowed to depend only on "x" and "t", and not on [itex] \frac{dx}{dt} [/itex].

Setting things so general we have to use the fundamental variational principle of Hamilton which selects the physically realizable mechanical states,which are of course the solutions of Lagrange equations.

Daniel.
 

Related Threads for: Functional variation of Lagrangian densities

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
723
Top