Fundamental laws time reversal

  • #1
It is often told that fundamental laws are insensitive to +t/-t change. Let's try this one: a little mass m1 object is accelerating towards a big object M2, in -x direction in space and +t in time, due to gravity or following space-time free fall line (along a geodetic). Now, revert the video and look at the -t history. What happens is absolutely innatural. Am I not speaking of some fundamental law?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
jbriggs444
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
10,242
4,864
It is often told that fundamental laws are insensitive to +t/-t change. Let's try this one: a little mass m1 object is accelerating towards a big object M2, in -x direction in space and +t in time, due to gravity or following space-time free fall line (along a geodetic). Now, revert the video and look at the -t history. What happens is absolutely innatural. Am I not speaking of some fundamental law?
A small object flying away from a big object and decelerating as it goes is natural and in complete accordance with the laws of classical mechanics. Any object launched with a velocity greater than or equal to escape velocity will follow such a free-fall geodesic trajectory. [If the incoming object fails to intersect with the surface of the big object, it will continue on just such an outbound path]

Edit: trajectories with less than escape velocity are reversible as well.
 
  • Like
Likes Alfredo Tifi
  • #3
Dale
Mentor
Insights Author
2020 Award
31,970
8,881
Now, revert the video and look at the -t history. What happens is absolutely innatural.
Why do you say it is unnatural?

In the simplest case we have ##x(t)=0.5 g t^2+v_0 t+ x_0##. What do you get when you make the transformation ##t \rightarrow -T##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Alfredo Tifi
  • #4
... Any object launched with a velocity less than or equal to escape velocity will follow such a free-fall geodesic trajectory...
Thank you Jbriggs to help me recognizing a misconcept of mine :-)
 
  • #5
Why do you say it is unnatural?

In the simplest case we have ##x(t)=0.5 g t^2+v_0 t+ x_0##. What do you get when you make the transformation ##t \rightarrow -T##
Sorry Dale. I just mistaken a spatial mirrored motion for a time inversion (repulsion instead of attraction).
 
  • #7
It is often told that fundamental laws are insensitive to +t/-t change. Let's try this one: a little mass m1 object is accelerating towards a big object M2, in -x direction in space and +t in time, due to gravity or following space-time free fall line (along a geodetic). Now, revert the video and look at the -t history. What happens is absolutely innatural. Am I not speaking of some fundamental law?

To see the effects of time reversal in classical mechanics you just have to change the sign of all velocities -- that is, reverse their direction. In a gravity field the original, un-reversed falling object would be speeding up, falling faster and faster. Imagine you reverse the velocity. Now the object is moving upward, presumably because someone on the ground threw it up into the air. The object retraces its path, but this time its speed will be decreasing as gravity gradually slows it down. Then the graph of height versus time will be exactly the same.
 

Related Threads on Fundamental laws time reversal

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
690
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
717
  • Poll
  • Last Post
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
5K
Top