Fundamental Question

  • Thread starter Domnu
  • Start date
  • #1
178
0
Hi, I'm extremely new to quantum mechanics (my only knowledge of quantum mechanics is that taught in physics C, ergo none, and a bit of wave mechanics... however I have a pretty strong mathematics background... diff-eqs + linear alg. + vector calc.), and was wondering as to how the derivation of

[tex]

\[
E = \hbar \omega \iff p = \hbar k
\]

[/tex]

worked. Here's my derivation, which seems encouraging, but could someone tell me where my derivation messed up?

[tex]

\[
E = \hbar \omega \iff \frac{1}{2} pv = \hbar \cdot 2 \pi f \iff
\frac{1}{2} p= \hbar \cdot \frac{2\pi}{\lambda} \iff p = 2 \hbar k \neq \hbar k
\]

[/tex]
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
410
0
The problem lies in the difference between phase velocity and group velocity. And neither of these equations are really derived, although they are "consistent". de Broglie did it from analogies between classical mechanics and Fermat's ideas about light.
 
  • #3
dx
Homework Helper
Gold Member
2,011
18
[tex]

\[
E = \hbar \omega \iff \frac{1}{2} pv = \hbar \cdot 2 \pi f \iff
\frac{1}{2} p= \hbar \cdot \frac{2\pi}{\lambda} \iff p = 2 \hbar k \neq \hbar k
\]

[/tex]

You should use the relativistic expression for energy. For example, to verify the relation for a photon, use

[tex] E = pc [/tex].

This can be derived from electromagnetic theory, or from the relation

[tex] E^2 = p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4 [/tex]

by setting m = 0. If we put this in [tex] E = \hbar \omega [/tex], we get

[tex] pc = \hbar \omega = \hbar 2\pi f[/tex].

Since [tex] f\lambda = c [/tex], we get

[tex] p = \hbar \frac{2\pi}{\lambda} = \hbar k [/tex].
 

Related Threads on Fundamental Question

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
806
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
838
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
28
Views
5K
Top