Fundamental subspaces of A?

  • #1
125
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

When studying linear algebra when encountering a system Ax=b, I always read of the fundamental subspaces of A: N (the null space, all solutions x of Ax=0), the column or domain space of A: (the space spanned by the columns of A, or in other words, all possible b for Ax=b), the row space (the space spanned by the rows of A. I have a harder time wrapping my head around this one).


But I had another question. What about all the possible vectors x for a given b, such that Ax=b ? I get that this wouldn't always work because say, some systems are inconsistent and have no solutions so it would be empty in this case. It seems like this wouldn't necessarily be a subspace because it wouldn't necessarily be closed under addition (just because x is a solution to Ax=b doesn't mean A(2x)=b is a solution). But sometimes it would be a subspace. Because for example, the nullspace would just be the special case where b = 0, the 0 vector, and we know the nullspace is a subspace. Is this "solution space" given special importance? If so what's it called? (I keep calling it a solution space and I just don't know what the proper name of it is)
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
chiro
Science Advisor
4,790
131
  • #3
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,770
911
When studying linear algebra when encountering a system Ax=b, I always read of the fundamental subspaces of A: N (the null space, all solutions x of Ax=0), the column or domain space of A: (the space spanned by the columns of A, or in other words, all possible b for Ax=b), the row space (the space spanned by the rows of A. I have a harder time wrapping my head around this one).


But I had another question. What about all the possible vectors x for a given b, such that Ax=b ?
If Ax= b, then A(x+ v)= Ax+ Av= b for any v in the null space of A.

I get that this wouldn't always work because say, some systems are inconsistent and have no solutions so it would be empty in this case. It seems like this wouldn't necessarily be a subspace because it wouldn't necessarily be closed under addition (just because x is a solution to Ax=b doesn't mean A(2x)=b is a solution). But sometimes it would be a subspace. Because for example, the nullspace would just be the special case where b = 0, the 0 vector, and we know the nullspace is a subspace. Is this "solution space" given special importance? If so what's it called? (I keep calling it a solution space and I just don't know what the proper name of it is)
The only time a "solution space" (which is, in fact, a standard name for it) is a subspace is when b= 0. In the case that [itex]b\ne 0[/itex], the "solution set" is a "linear manifold"- something like a line or plane in R3 that does NOTcontain the origin. It can be shown that if v is a vector satisfying Ax= b, then any solution of Ax= b can be written as v plus a vector satisfying Ax= 0. Since Ax= 0 is a subspace, it contains a basis so any solution to Ax= 0 can be written as a linear combination of basis vectors. And so any solution of Ax= b can be written as such linear combination of basis vectors plus v.
 

Related Threads for: Fundamental subspaces of A?

Replies
3
Views
478
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
Top