Fusion Help

  • Thread starter toml42
  • Start date
6
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

I need a bit of help here, as part of a class project i was trying to explain how fusion, binding energy, reactors etc work. I always like to go a bit more indepth than the syllabus requires, and i wanted an explanation of how D-T fusion worked mathematically, to clearly show how the binding energy becomes output energy - however, whenever i do the calculations, i don't get the same net energy output as I find online, 17.6 MeV. I always end up with about 17.1.
I tried to compensate for the initial energies, relativistic masses and the coulomb barrier, but I'm still not a huge deal closer. Can anyone give me any clues as to what i may be missing? If nothing is obvious i'll add a brief of summary of the calculations i did.
Thanks, Tom.
 

Answers and Replies

malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
4,782
22
Well there is no way that we can see what misstake you made if you not show us your work.
 
6
0
Ok, I'll give a brief summary, i was just wondering if I'd missed something face slappingly obvious. this is before i started trying to correct it with extra bits, they didn't help a huge amount.

BEFORE
Deutrium 2.013004633
Tritium 3.01550062
Total 5.028505253

AFTER
Helium 4.0015
Neutron 1.008664917
Total 5.010164917

Missing amu 0.018340336
In kg 3.04548E-29
E = MC2
energy 2.73714E-12

MeV 17.08
 
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
4,782
22
He-4 atomic mass is 4.00260323 amu, there is your error.
 
6
0
i used the mass of an alpha particle, which explains the difference, because the electrons shouldnt be involved in a nuclear reaction should they?
 
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
4,782
22
then you must remove the electrons from the deuterim and tritium also. Remember that what is listes are ofte the ATOMIC masses. So one must be careful...and cosistent.

Yes you are right, in reality (in a fusion reactor) only nuclei takes part in the reaction.

Also: Post course work / homework questions in appropirate home work forum, this forum is not for those kind of questions which can be read here: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=171607
 
6
0
I did remove the electrons from them too, sorry, i should have made that clearer. I didn't think to post it in the homework area because it isn't part of my syllabus, this is more of an outside concern really.
 
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
4,782
22
ok in that case:

nuclear masses before=
5.02905362 amu

Nuclear masses after=
5.010170986 amu

gives 17.58906 MeV
 
6
0
Right, thanks, that's close enough, and when i use those values it works with my calculations. my values for atomic mass must have been slightly off... for future reference, where do you go to find yours?
Thanks for your help, Tom.
 
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
4,782
22
Last edited by a moderator:
6
0
Thanks so much for your help, that website is really usefull! just out of interest though, can you think of anything that might account for the slight discrepancy we're still getting?

My calculations say that if the particles were travelling at about 2.5 million metres per second at the start of the reaction that would be enough extra energy to account for it... that sounds like a reasonable enough speed for high energy particles in a 100,000,000 K fusion reactor... am i on the right lines here maybe?
 
Last edited:
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
4,782
22
1. The source you have ARE already listing nuclear masses and you substract the electron mass again..

2. Lack of accurateness, use ALL significant figures that you can. 17MeV is a very very small unit (3% of electron mass, and one electron is 1/1800 of a nucleon), so be careful!

3. The source you used have listed totaly wrong numbers for atomic masses.

With the numbers I used, I got 17.6MeV, which is what the answer tells you.
 

Related Threads for: Fusion Help

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
23K
  • Last Post
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
Top