G-equidecomposable and equivalence relation

  • Thread starter JSG31883
  • Start date
  • #1
13
0
G acts via isometries on a set X, and A,B are subsets of X. Prove that the relation A~B is an equivalence relation on subsets of X iff A and B are G-equidecomposable.


I think this has to do with the Banach-Schroder theorem, but am not sure. I know it is a definition in group theory, but am not sure how to prove it since it seem pretty self explanitory to me.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
13
0
Can someone help????
 
  • #3
matt grime
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
9,395
3
define G-equidecomposable, please,

the result should be easy isnce it just checking 3 things for the property of equidecomposability, whatever that may be, which are generally trivial for groups since groups have inverses, and identity and composition is associative. eg if X~Y and g in G effects this relation, then g^{-1} will (probably) effect the relation Y~X, if X~Y and Y~Z and the relation is because of elements f and g resp. then gf wil mean that X~Y, and X~X because e(X)=X.

note i haven't a clue what equidecompsoability is, but this will be the proof, i'm almost sure of it.
 

Related Threads on G-equidecomposable and equivalence relation

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
510
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
748
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
831
Top