- #1

JSG31883

- 13

- 0

I think this has to do with the Banach-Schroder theorem, but am not sure. I know it is a definition in group theory, but am not sure how to prove it since it seem pretty self explanitory to me.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter JSG31883
- Start date

- #1

JSG31883

- 13

- 0

I think this has to do with the Banach-Schroder theorem, but am not sure. I know it is a definition in group theory, but am not sure how to prove it since it seem pretty self explanitory to me.

- #2

JSG31883

- 13

- 0

Can someone help?

- #3

matt grime

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 9,426

- 4

the result should be easy isnce it just checking 3 things for the property of equidecomposability, whatever that may be, which are generally trivial for groups since groups have inverses, and identity and composition is associative. eg if X~Y and g in G effects this relation, then g^{-1} will (probably) effect the relation Y~X, if X~Y and Y~Z and the relation is because of elements f and g resp. then gf wil mean that X~Y, and X~X because e(X)=X.

note i haven't a clue what equidecompsoability is, but this will be the proof, I'm almost sure of it.

Share:

- Last Post

- Replies
- 14

- Views
- 745

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 341

- Replies
- 27

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 342

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 925

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 282

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 362

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 453

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 320

- Last Post

- Replies
- 17

- Views
- 286