Galois group of x^4+1 over Q

  • Thread starter Daveyboy
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Group
In summary, the conversation discussed the process of splitting a polynomial and permuting its roots in order to obtain a Galois group of S4. However, it was determined that the Galois group is actually the Klein four-group \mathbf{V} , as the roots were not algebraically independent and there are only two possible isomorphism types for groups of order four. The conversation also mentioned the use of complex conjugation and the transitive action of the Galois group on the roots.
  • #1
58
0
This thing splits if we adjoin e^ipi/4.
Let [tex]\zeta[/tex]=e^ipi/4 =[tex]\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}[/tex]+[tex]\frac{i\sqrt{2}}{2}[/tex]
so x4+1=

(x-[tex]\zeta[/tex])(x-[tex]\zeta[/tex]2)(x-[tex]\zeta[/tex]3)(x-[tex]\zeta[/tex]4).

Then I want to permute these roots so the Galois group is just S4.

But, Q([tex]\zeta[/tex])=Q(i,[tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex]) and [Q(i,[tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex]):Q]=4 (degree)

I have the theorem that Galois group [tex]\leq[/tex] degree of splitting field over base field.

Since |S4|=24 something is wrong, but what I can not find what is wrong with the logic.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This isn't really in my field of expertise, but zeta, zeta^2, zeta^3 and zeta^4 aren't algebraically independent over the rationals, now are they? If you choose for example to map zeta->zeta^2, you really don't have any choices about how to map the other roots. The symmetry group of the automorphisms is not S4. I think that's the answer. Do you agree?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
The Galois group is actually [tex] \mathbf{V} [/tex], the Klein four-group. You know that the Galois group has to have order 4, since the extension [tex] \mathbb{Q}(\zeta) [/tex] is Galois over [tex] \mathbb{Q} [/tex]. There are only two isomorphism types for groups of order four, i.e., the Klein four-group and the cyclic group of order four. You can distinguish between them by the fact that [tex] \mathbf{V} [/tex] has two elements of order 2, while [tex] C_4 [/tex] only has one. Thus, all you need to do is construct two elements of the Galois group having order 2. In any extension involving complex numbers, you know that complex conjugation is an automorphism of order two. To get another one, invoke the theorem that says that the Galois group acts transitively on the roots of any irreducible polynomial.

Edit: [tex] \mathbf{V} [/tex] actually has three elements of order 2. Constructing two of them still suffices, however, since [tex] C_4 [/tex] only has one.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Nice, conjugate, that makes sense. I ruled out Klein group to quickly!
 

Suggested for: Galois group of x^4+1 over Q

Replies
1
Views
252
Replies
4
Views
818
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
811
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
919
Replies
17
Views
934
Back
Top