1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Game Theory Explanation

  1. Jan 4, 2012 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    My Textbook gives the following example problem:

    Cournot Duopoly with incomplete information.

    The profit functions are given by:
    u_i = q_i(θ_¡ - q_i - q_j)

    Firm 1 has one type θ_1 = 1, but firm 2 has private information about its type θ_2. Firm 1
    believes that θ_2= 3/4 with probability 1/2 and θ _2 = 5/4 with probability 1/2, and this belief is common knowledge.

    We will look for a pure strategy equilibrium of this game. Firm 2 of type θ_2’s decision
    problem is to

    max q_2: q_2(θ_2 - q_1 - q_2)

    which is solved at
    q_'2(θ_2) = (θ_2-q_1)/2


    Firm 1’s decision problem, on the other hand, is
    max q_1: 1/2 * q_1 (1 - q_1 - q_'2(3/4)) + 1/2 * q_1(1-q_1-q_'2(5/4))

    which is solved at
    q_'1 = (2-q_'2 (3/4)-q_'2(5/4))/4

    Solving yields,
    q_'1 = 1/3
    q_'2(3/4) = 11/24
    q_'2(5/4) = 5/24

    Atempt at a solution

    I can't figure out how they got from the equations q_'1 and q_'2 to the answers given in the "solving yields" part. It seems like simultaneous equations, but I'm not sure what to do with the q_1 or really where to begin.
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data



    2. Relevant equations



    3. The attempt at a solution
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 4, 2012 #2
    Recall that in any bayesian game, strategies are mappings from types to quantities. This means that firm 2 'quantity' must specify what the the type [itex]\theta_{2}=3/4[/itex] will produce and how much the type [itex]\theta_{2}=5/4[/itex] will produce. Now, since firm 2 knows his own type, it can maximize using this information: this is why you obtain two best response functions, one for each type. Next, to compute the Nash equilibrium you also need to derive a best response for firm 1. Firm 1 only know the probability of each type and hence, incorporates two different quantities (one for each type) together with the probabilities of meeting each type in his maximization problem. This will give you a third best response that must be a function of the quantity type [itex]\theta_2=3/4[/itex] is expected to produce, and the quantity that type [itex]\theta_2=5/4[/itex] is expected to produce. All this gives you 3 equations (2 best responses for firm 2 and one for firm 1) and 3 unknowns (quanties for each type of firm 2 and the quantity for firm 1). You can solve this system of equations the way you like (substitution, reduction, etc). This will give you the solutions you state in the last part of your question.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Game Theory Explanation
  1. Game Theory (Replies: 4)

  2. Game Theory 2x2 Matrix (Replies: 1)

  3. Game theory: nim (Replies: 16)

  4. Game theory (Replies: 2)

Loading...