If we work in cartesian coordinates, we say for instance, that(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]D_x \phi = \left( \frac{\partial}{\partial x} + i g \sum_a T_a A^a_x \right) \phi[/tex]

where g is the gauge coupling, and [itex]\{T^a\}[/itex] are the generators of the gauge group, and [itex]\{A^a_\mu\}[/itex] is the gauge vector field.

But what happens when we go to curvilinear coordinates. Specifically, suppose we're in 2 space dimensions, do we have, in polar coordinates

[tex]D_\theta \phi = \left( \frac{\partial}{\partial \theta} + i g \sum_a T_a A^a_\theta \right) \phi[/tex]?

The reason why I ask is Sidney Coleman says in his lectures on what he calls lumps, that

[tex]e_\theta \cdot D \phi = \left(\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial}{\partial \theta} + i g \sum_a T_a A^a_\theta \right) \phi[/tex]

I'm not sure why the gauge field term does not also have a factor of 1/r.

I must be missing something elementary.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Gauge covariant derivative in curvilinear coordinates

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Gauge covariant derivative | Date |
---|---|

I Does a covariant version of Euler-Lagrange exist? | Feb 20, 2018 |

Temporal Gauge | Mar 21, 2012 |

Christoffel Symbols - Gauge Fields | Jun 23, 2011 |

Covariant derivative vs Gauge Covariant derivative | Jun 16, 2011 |

Nonabelian gauge field | Jun 3, 2005 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**