Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Gauss and Stokes

  1. Aug 26, 2004 #1
    Hi folks,

    I'm working on the following problem...

    Show that the flux of the vector field [tex]\nabla \times A[/tex] through a closed surface is zero. Use both Gauss and Stokes.

    Where can I begin?

  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 26, 2004 #2

    matt grime

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    From the definitions. What is the flux over a closed surface, and what do the mentioned theorems allow you to do to integrals etc, and what identities do you know that might be useful. write them ot and use them.
  4. Aug 26, 2004 #3
    Ok I started using this...

    [tex]\nabla\times A = (\frac{\partial r}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial q}{\partial z})i + (\frac{\partial p}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial r}{\partial x})j+(\frac{\partial q}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial p}{\partial y})k[/tex]

    Then...Gauss theorem

    [tex]\int_V (\nabla \bullet A) dV [/tex]

    So do I basically substitute the top eqn into Gauss's theorem?

  5. Aug 26, 2004 #4
    Yes - and I don't think you need Stokes' theorem in this.
  6. Aug 27, 2004 #5
    the easiest way i can think of is taking a closed surface and splitting it into two surfaces with a single curve, then applying what you know about Stokes's theorem to the necessary values of the flux on the two surfaces. for example, consider a spherical surface, and then choose the equator as the defining curve. almost no equations needed, just plain logic. of course you could do the substitution of the derivatives and then show that the expression in the integral is zero using Gauss's theorem, but that's more writing (depending on if your teacher makes you prove the vector identity). i think that the first explanation is more "physically" satisfying.
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2004
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Gauss and Stokes
  1. Stoke's theorem (Replies: 1)

  2. Stokes Theroem (Replies: 1)

  3. Stokes theorem (Replies: 1)

  4. Stokes theorem (Replies: 2)