- #1

misogynisticfeminist

- 370

- 0

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter misogynisticfeminist
- Start date

- #1

misogynisticfeminist

- 370

- 0

- #2

OlderDan

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 3,021

- 2

Gaussian surfaces are chosen based on the known symmetry of the charge distribution. For any spherically symmetric charge distribution, you know that the electric field must be radial with constant magnitude at any specific distance from the center of symmetry, so you use a spherical surface for the Gaussian integral. For a uniform plane of charge, or just outside the surface of a metal, you know the field must point directly away from the surface and be constant at any given distance from it. The Gaussian "pillbox" exploits this symmetry to make the integral trivial to evaluate. Inside a metal, the field must be zero, so a closed surface everywhere within a metal yields a zero Gaussian integral. When there is no symmetry, Gauss' Law is still valid, but not particularly useful.misogynisticfeminist said:

Share:

- Last Post

- Replies
- 20

- Views
- 692

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 405

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 433

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 776

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 546

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 438

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 261

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 362

- Replies
- 10

- Views
- 576