1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Gauss' Law

  1. Feb 1, 2016 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    (a) A spherical insulating shell of radius R = 3.00 m has its centre at the origin and carries a surface charge density σ = 3.00 nC/m2. Use Gauss’s law to find the electric field on the x axis at (i) x = 2.00m and (ii) x = 4.00 m. Give you answers in the vector form.

    (b) A point charge q = 250 nC is added to the y axis at y = 2.00 m. Determine the new values of electric field at positions (i) and (ii). Give you answers in the vector form.

    2. Relevant equations
    ∫|E|dA = Q/ε0
    σ = Q/4πr2

    3. The attempt at a solution
    I think I've done the first one my sing a simple gaussian surface arriving at 0 electric field at x = 2.00 as inside the hollow sphere and E = σR20r2 = 190.6 Nc-1 i

    However for part b i get confused as I'm not sure as to wether the charge not being in the centre affects it due to the distribution changing.
    Currently I'm thinking that when x = 2.0m you create a gaussian surface where r=R and the charge enclosed is only that of q. For x = 4 could you do the same as before except the charge enclosed is now σrπR2 + q. That is what i would do if the additional charge was at the origin but as it is not i don't know how to take this into account.
    Thanks
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 1, 2016 #2
    The first part seems correct to me.
    For the second part you're can only use Gauss's law to determine the ##E-##field when you know the direction of the ##E## field. This is only possible when you have certain perfect symmetries (spherical, infinite plane, infinite cylinder symmetry) which isn't true unless the charge is at the centre. However luckily the ##E## fields obey the superposition principle. So The total field at a point ##r## is simply ##E(r) = E_1(r) + E_2(r)## if you have fields from two charge distributions.
     
  4. Feb 1, 2016 #3
    So could i just find the electric field of the point charge using kq/r2 and add it to the electric field found by using Gauss law?
     
  5. Feb 1, 2016 #4
    Yes but remember the fields also have a direction each so you would have to do vector addition.
     
  6. Feb 1, 2016 #5
    I often get the vector part wrong - so for when x = 4m would E due to q = kq/r2 where r = √(22+42) but that would be in-between the x/y directions. Would I then resolve this is the x direction by taking Esin(θ) where θ=arctan(4/2). And to this term i finally add the field gained in part 1).
     
  7. Feb 1, 2016 #6
    Involving the trigonometric functions works but is unnecessarily complicated imo. The direction of ##r## is simply ##\hat r## which just is the normed position vector (which you already know in Cartesian coordinates). Drawing a figure often helps when figuring out the direction as well if you are uncertain.
     
  8. Feb 1, 2016 #7
    Thanks! I'll try and do it that way as i think thats the way we're supposed to! Thank you so much for all of your help.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Gauss' Law
  1. Gauss Law (Replies: 5)

  2. Gauss' law (Replies: 2)

  3. Gauss's law? (Replies: 2)

  4. Gauss Law (Replies: 6)

Loading...