1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Gaussian Optics / Paraxial Approximation

  1. Nov 28, 2004 #1
    Derive

    [tex] \frac{n_1}{s_o} + \frac{n_2}{s_i} = \frac{n_2-n_1}{R} [/tex]

    for Gaussian optics from the following equation

    [tex] \frac{n_1}{l_o} + \frac{n_2}{l_i} = \frac{1}{R} \left( \frac{n_2s_i}{l_i} - \frac{n_1 s_o}{l_o} \right)[/tex]

    by approximating

    [tex] l_o = \sqrt{R^2 + \left( s_o + R \right) ^2 - 2R\left( s_o + R \right) \cos \phi} [/tex]

    and

    [tex] l_i = \sqrt{R^2 + \left( s_i - R \right) ^2 - 2R\left( s_i - R \right) \cos \phi} [/tex]

    with the aid of

    [tex] \cos \phi \approx 1 [/tex]

    [tex] \hline [/tex]

    Here is what I have:

    [tex] l_o \approx \sqrt{R^2 + \left( s_o + R \right) ^2 - 2R\left( s_o + R \right) } = \sqrt{R^2 + s_o ^2 + R^2 + 2s_o R - 2s_o R - 2R^2 } = s_o [/tex]

    and

    [tex] l_i \approx \sqrt{R^2 + \left( s_i - R \right) ^2 - 2R\left( s_i - R \right) } = \sqrt{R^2 + s_i ^2 + R^2 -2s_i R - 2Rs_i + 2R^2} = 2R-s_i [/tex]

    But, I expected to find [tex] l_i \approx s_i [/tex] .... what I have doesn't seem to work out. I can't find where I made a mistake, though.

    Thanks
     
    Last edited: Nov 28, 2004
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 28, 2004 #2
    Well keep in mind that the li and l0 are in the denominator...

    You need to use the fact that [tex]\frac{1}{2R(1-\frac{s_i}{2R})} = \frac{1}{2R}(1 + \frac{s_i}{2R} +...)[/tex]

    Because of the paraxial approximation you have that si >>> R


    regards
    marlon : ps are you sure about these formulas ??? Shouldn't there be a minus sign in the left hand side of your first given formula...
     
    Last edited: Nov 28, 2004
  4. Nov 29, 2004 #3
    I've double checked my equations. Unfortunately, they're exactly equal to those in my calc book (Calculus: Concepts and Contexts 2nd Ed. by James Stewart - page 632). Well, I did some more work, but couldn't get the desired result. Anyway, here you go:

    If

    [tex] \frac{n_1}{s_o} = \frac{n_1}{l_o} [/tex]

    and

    [tex] \frac{n_2}{s_i} = \frac{n_2}{2R-s_i} = \frac{n_2}{2R\left( 1 - \frac{s_i}{2R} \right)} = \frac{n_2}{2R} \sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} \left( \frac{s_i}{2R} \right)^n \approx \frac{n_2}{2R} [/tex]

    Then

    [tex] \frac{n_1}{s_o} + \frac{n_2}{s_i} = \frac{n_1}{l_o} + \frac{n_2}{2R} = \frac{2Rn_1 + s_o n_2}{2Rs_o} = \frac{1}{R}\left( \frac{Rn_1}{s_o} + \frac{n_2}{2} \right) \neq \frac{n_2 - n_1}{R} [/tex]

    In other words, I'm stuck! :smile:
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Gaussian Optics / Paraxial Approximation
  1. Gaussian surface (Replies: 2)

  2. Gaussian Surfaces (Replies: 16)

  3. Gaussian cylinder (Replies: 1)

Loading...