I've been reading the text: Electricity and Magnetism, by Purcell.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I understand about the integral forms describing the electric field, but when trying to answer questions at the end of the chapter on Gauss's and Stokes's therorems I have not been able two. These two theorems supposedly transform the integral equations that describe an electric field into differential equations, yet there are still integrals in the equations:

Gauss:

[tex]Integrate[F*da,over surface]=Integrate[div F*dv,over volume][/tex]

[tex]div F=4\pi\rho, del^2*potential=-4\pi\rho[/tex]

Stokes:

[tex]Integrate[F*ds,over circ.]=Integrate[curl F*da,over surface][/tex]

[tex]del X A[/tex]

Questions:

1. I'm having trouble with looking at field lines and judging if div F=0 (or not zero) or curl F=0 (or not zero)

2. How to calculate flux/volume for Gauss problems. I see in the book they use the midpoint. Or flux/area for Stokes problems. Why do the choose the midpoint?

3. Also would someone explain the sidways derivative of the curl, I don't understand why it is the way it is.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Gauss's Divergance Theorem and Stokes's Theorem

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**