• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Gauss's Law and flux

  • #1
203
0
Ok guys, these are just questions from our book(like critical thinking type).....she said to be able to understand these, for the upcoming test. I'm not sure I fully understand them(if at all).

1. If a closed surface surrounds a dipole, the net flux through the surface is zero. True or False?


2. If the net flux through a closed surface is zero, then there can be no charge or charges within that surface. True or False?


I think the equation to find flux is Gauss's Law, which says E=Q(enclosed)/E(knot). With Q being a negative number(dipole), then I'd say the flux can't be zero.

Along with what I just said, then if Q=0, then there can not be any flux within that surface.....right?

Thanks guys!!!
Brad

Oh, one more question. Are Equipotential lines vectors? I'm thinking they are, but need to know to figure a question.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Doc Al
Mentor
44,939
1,200
Bradracer18 said:
With Q being a negative number(dipole), then I'd say the flux can't be zero.
What makes you think Q (total charge?) is negative for a dipole?
 
  • #3
203
0
Well I'm not sure, I guess that is just what I thought. I don't really understand the whole dipole thing(even in chemistry I struggled). Isn't it a negative charge, that will go towards a postive charge? Or, how do I figure Q for the dipole?
 
  • #4
Doc Al
Mentor
44,939
1,200
An electric dipole consists of two opposite charges with a separation between them; the net charge is zero.
 
  • #5
203
0
So then with that information, I'd say that Q=0, thus the flux is 0. So, it is true.

For the second one, if a dipole is considered a charge....then I'd say it is false.

Also Doc Al....can ya help me with the vector question, so I can start working on it.....are those equipotential lines vectors??? I can't find it anywhere in my book that says they are(which might mean they aren't), but I was thinking they were for some reason.

Thank you again!!
 
  • #6
Doc Al
Mentor
44,939
1,200
Bradracer18 said:
So then with that information, I'd say that Q=0, thus the flux is 0. So, it is true.

For the second one, if a dipole is considered a charge....then I'd say it is false.
Both correct.

....can ya help me with the vector question, so I can start working on it.....are those equipotential lines vectors???
Hint: Does an equipotential line (surface, actually) have a direction?
 
  • #7
203
0
No I don't think they do actually have a direction, as far as I know. They aren't like field lines which go from + to -. I think basically they just run perpendicular to field lines, in no general direction. So, no they aren't vectors then.
 
  • #8
Doc Al
Mentor
44,939
1,200
You are correct.
 
  • #9
203
0
Thanks a lot Doc...I appreciate every bit of it!!!!
 

Related Threads on Gauss's Law and flux

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
679
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
13K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
19K
Top