1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: General DE question

  1. Oct 15, 2008 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Say something has an amount and it decreases by 20% a year. Lets say the starting amount is 100. Then, after 1 year youd expect the amount to be 80.

    The DE x'(t) = -.20x(t) would represent the above comment. I think. (x(t) is a function of the amount after time t.)

    However, if you solved that DE and found your function x(t) and plugged in 1 for t, you would not get 80.

    Why is this so?
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 16, 2008 #2
    hm... this question makes me feel really stupid since I don't know, and I'm 3rd year math&physics major.

    However, if you assume your DE solution is of the form x'(t)=-a x(t) and get solution x(t)=100e^(-a t)... then you can just solve this for a such that it fits x(1)=80.

    I know it's a stupid solution, but the best I can offer you... and since I just tried it in mathematica I know it will fit your expectations for x(2) and x(3) also. I somehow managed never to look at diffeq. in this realistic of a way...
  4. Oct 16, 2008 #3
    Thanks for the reply. If I did as you said though, and solved x(t) = 100e^(-at) so that x(1) = 80, then it wouldn't decrease at 20% as stated previously. So it can either decrease at 20% or equal 80, but not both. Which is odd because logically it would 80. The DE isn't wrong is it? I would be curious to know the explanation as well.
  5. Oct 17, 2008 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    "decreases by 20% a year" means that x(n+1)= x(n)- 0.2 x(n)= 0.8x(n), a difference equation. The differential equation you give, assumingntinuous decrease corresponds to an annual decrease of slightly more: about 22.3%. It is exactly the same as noting that if you put money in an account at 20% compounded continuously it will earn the same interest as an acount giveing simple interest of 22.3%
  6. Oct 17, 2008 #5
    Thank ye.
  7. Oct 17, 2008 #6
    So now what if I have a question that says: Something loses a certain percent of value per year. Write a DE and solve. If something loses a certain percent value per year, then the rate of decrease wouldn't be proportional to itself and there wouldn't be a DE would there?
  8. Oct 17, 2008 #7


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    No, it is "proportional" but with a different proportionality.

    Suppose you know that quantity x loses "k" percent per year. That is the same as saying that dx/dt= -ax but a is NOT equal to "k/100". The solution to dx/dt= -ax, with x(0)= 1 is, as you say, x(t)= e-at. After 1 year that will be x(1)= e-a so that the amount lost was 1- e-a= k/100 That is the same as e-a= 1- k/100 so -a= ln(1- k/100)= ln((100-k)/100) or a= ln(100)- ln(100-k).

    Notice that after the second year, x(2)= e-2a so the x has decreased from ea to e-2a= e-a- (e-a)[sup2= x1- x1( e-a). That is, during the second year x had decreased by the same proportion of its vaue as it did the first year.
  9. Oct 17, 2008 #8
    For an example: You have a computer that loses 20% of its value per year.

    Would this equation not work? x(t+1) = x(t)(0.8)^t. Thats not a DE but that would work would it not?

    Also, let me see if I get what your saying. The DE dx/dt = -ax (where a is a constant, but not equal to -0.2), and you have to solve for a, based on conditions?
  10. Oct 17, 2008 #9


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    If you mean x(t+1)= (0.8)x(t), without the "^t", yes, that would be a "difference equation" that would give the correct value for t integer valued years.

    Also, let me see if I get what your saying. The DE dx/dt = -ax (where a is a constant, but not equal to -0.2), and you have to solve for a, based on conditions?[/QUOTE]
    Since you were asking about the percentage change, you can take any a(0) you like. The general solution to it is x(t)= x(0)e-at. Then x(1)= x(0)e-a so that x(1)/x(0)= e-a. In fact, for any two succesive years, x(t)= x(0)e-at and x(t+1)= x(0)e-at-a and dividing one by the other x(t+1)/x(t)= e-a. IF a quantity loses 20% of its value per year, then that proportion would be 0.80 so you must have e-a= .8 or a= -ln(.8) which is approximately .223. In general, if a quantity loses "k" percent of its value each year, then the proportion is 1- k/100= (100- k)/100 so we have e-a= (100- k)/100 as I just said. Given k, you can solve that for a.
  11. Oct 17, 2008 #10
    So the moral of the story is that if you say something loses a certain percent per year, then in the DE the proportionality constant is not quite that value. You have to solve for "a"

    to clarify:

    if something loses 20% of its value each year then the DE would not equal x'(t) = -.20x(t)
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook