General gravity wave question

In summary, a recent news release from LIGO announced a null result in their gravity wave detection work and concluded that gravitational waves did not exist at a certain level of significance. This was not surprising, as the expected sources of GWs, such as colliding black holes or supernova explosions, would not produce a significant change in the center of gravity that could be detected. The report also stated that waves above a certain amplitude threshold could be ruled out, but did not imply that gravity waves do not exist.
  • #1
jnorman
316
0
a recent news release indicated that LIGO had a null result on its gravity wave detection work, and that they were concluding that GWs did not exist, at least at a certain level of significance. i am also not surprised. the examples of situations where GWs were to be expected were colliding black holes or supernova explosions.

my question is why we would expect to be able to detect GWs even from either of those types of events. in the event of colliding BHs, we would assume that the BHs in question are rather far removed from the earth, and that, as a "system" (pair of BHs) at any stellar distance from us, the center of gravity would not significantly change as they collide, so why would we expect to detect GWs? same with a supernova - since the center of gravity of the involved material would not change, why would we expect to detect GWs? in order to effectively detect GWs, it seems to me that it would require a fairly extreme change in the center of gravity of a very massive body - something that is not even really possible (is it?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Could you please provide a link to this report?

Thanks
Matt
 
  • #3
matt - here is an online news story about it:
http://www.livescience.com/space/090819-gravitational-waves.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
a recent news release indicated that LIGO had a null result on its gravity wave detection work, and that they were concluding that GWs did not exist, at least at a certain level of significance.
here is an online news story about it:
http://www.livescience.com/space/090...nal-waves.html
Sorry, those statements contradict each other. Did you actually read the story you're linking to?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
I think you are misunderstanding what that report is telling you.

From the report;

The fact that this first period of observations did not detect gravitational waves allows researchers to rule out the possibility of waves above a certain amplitude threshold.

This is simply implying that waves of a certain amplitude can be ruled out. Not that gravity waves do not exist.

Thanks
Matt
 
  • #6
Nor was LIGO expecting to detect anything at the current detection limit.
 

1. What are gravity waves?

Gravity waves are ripples in the fabric of space-time that are caused by the acceleration of massive objects. They were first predicted by Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity.

2. How are gravity waves detected?

Gravity waves are detected through their effects on the space-time fabric. This can be done through specialized instruments, such as interferometers, that measure tiny changes in the distance between objects caused by the passing of a gravity wave.

3. What is the significance of gravity waves?

Gravity waves provide evidence for the existence of gravitational interactions and help us better understand the nature of space and time. They also have practical applications in fields such as astronomy, where they can be used to study distant objects in the universe.

4. How fast do gravity waves travel?

Gravity waves travel at the speed of light, which is approximately 299,792,458 meters per second.

5. Can gravity waves be created or manipulated?

Gravity waves are created by the acceleration of massive objects, such as colliding black holes or orbiting neutron stars. They cannot be manipulated by humans, but their effects can be studied and observed through various instruments and techniques.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
746
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
703
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
449
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
69
Views
6K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top