- #1
SpartanG345
- 70
- 1
Hello I sometimes have difficulty determining weather a problem is solvable or have trouble gauging the difficulty of a certain approach.
I think this is because of a weak background in maths
Say you had a general 2d single rigid body problem
Which has 2 given forces and 3 unknowns
i understand that in a 2d equilibrium problem you can get at most 3 independent equations for a member, off course you can write more than that, ie the 4th equation but this will be redundant.
i also understand to solve a single variable you need to express that variable in terms of a constant ( ie 1 equation 1 constant solves 1 variables)
so i suppose with 2 constants you should be able to solve 2 variables using 2 equations of statical equilibrium. Using that result i suppose you can solve for the other variable
I think i have a basic understanding, but does anyone else have some tips for problem solving along these lines?
Oh yea i also wouldn't mind some tips on when to use method of sections vs method of joints
thanks
I think this is because of a weak background in maths
Say you had a general 2d single rigid body problem
Which has 2 given forces and 3 unknowns
i understand that in a 2d equilibrium problem you can get at most 3 independent equations for a member, off course you can write more than that, ie the 4th equation but this will be redundant.
i also understand to solve a single variable you need to express that variable in terms of a constant ( ie 1 equation 1 constant solves 1 variables)
so i suppose with 2 constants you should be able to solve 2 variables using 2 equations of statical equilibrium. Using that result i suppose you can solve for the other variable
I think i have a basic understanding, but does anyone else have some tips for problem solving along these lines?
Oh yea i also wouldn't mind some tips on when to use method of sections vs method of joints
thanks