1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

General Theory of Capacitance

  1. Aug 20, 2012 #1
    Hello,

    I came across this topic while reading Principles of Electrodynamics which can be read from this link starting at page 54.

    Looking at page 56, my question is how could there be induced charge on a grounded conductor ? what happens then to the equation Q = C * V, where Q is charge on the said conductor, C is capacitance of that conductor, and V is potential on that conductor.

    I would greatly appreciate it if someone provided a rigorous proof of his/her answer.

    Thanks
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 21, 2012 #2
    C = Q * V is only valid for a single conductor.

    For two conductors You have

    [tex] Q_1 = C_{11} V_1 + C_{21} V_2 [/tex]

    and

    [tex] Q_2 = C_{12} V_1 + C_{22} V_2 [/tex]

    If the second conductor is grounded you get:

    [tex] Q_1 = C_{11} V_1 [/tex]

    [tex] Q_2 = C_{12} V_1 [/tex]

    and nowhere is it said that [itex] C_{12} [/itex] must be positive.
     
  4. Aug 21, 2012 #3
    How does the existence of charge on the surface of a grounded conductor don't contradict Gauss's Law ?
     
  5. Aug 21, 2012 #4
    Gauss law relates the charge enclosed by a surface to the electric field perpendicular to the surface integrated across the entire surface. It does not say anything about the potential. To find the potential, you have to integrate the electric field due to BOTH charges from the surface of the grounded charge to infinity.
     
  6. Aug 21, 2012 #5
    Thanks for your reply and patience.

    I understand what Gauss's law is, my question is when there is charge on a grounded conductor, the charge will emanate electric field which will give a rise to a non zero potential when a line integral is taken from infinity to the surface of that charge. This is the contradiction to Gauss's law that confuses me.
     
  7. Aug 23, 2012 #6
    But if you take that line integral, you have to integrate the field of BOTH charges. one of them positive, the other negative. There actually HAS to be an induced charge to make that integral come out to 0.

    I don't think Gauss's law is any help computing that integral, but if you do, please state how.
     
  8. Aug 23, 2012 #7
    Thanks willem2 for answering my question. I apologize for creating the confusion by referring to induced charge. I'll try to break the issue into readable points.

    1- The author defines capacitance as the proportionality constant relating the potential at surface of the conductor relative to infinity to the free charge deposited on that conductor.

    2- The author now wants to extend this concept to relate the free charge on the ith conductor, to the potentials on several N conductors.

    3- To do that, the author says that all n≠1 conductors are grounded = having 0 potential. Except n=1 conductor.

    4- Now, the author starts to relate the free charge on conductors n= 2,3,.., N to the potential on conductor n = 1.

    My question is

    How could there be free charge on a conductor with potential equal to zero?

    My understanding is that a free charge will emit a field (assuming positive charge) that will give rise to a non-zero potential when an line integral of the electric field is carried out from infinity to the location of that charge whether its free space or a surface of a conductor.
     
  9. Aug 23, 2012 #8
    This is only valid for single isolated, spherically symmetric charges. You have to consider the fields of all the charges. These can give both positive and negative contributions to the line integral.

    If there were no induced charges, there would only be the field from the first charge, and this will definitely make the line integral from the second conductor to infinity nonzero, so there have to be induced charges.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: General Theory of Capacitance
  1. Proofing Capacitance (Replies: 2)

Loading...