1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Generalized coordinates

  1. Oct 17, 2007 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    When I use generalized coordinates how do I know that I can add the kinetic contributions from each to get the total kinetic energy? How do I know that you are not "counting the same KE twice"?

    e.g. if you have a double pendulum how do you know that you can just add the KE due to one angle to the KE due to the other angle?

    What if the angles are moving in opposite directions? Couldn't some KE cancel out then?


    2. Relevant equations



    3. The attempt at a solution
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 18, 2007 #2
    Kinetic energy is a *scalar* quantity, there is no inherent direction associated with it (i.e., it doesn't matter in what directions objects in a single system are moving with respect to each other or a static frame of reference, etc). There can only be *positive contributions* to kinetic energy fom each object; and, e.g., two masses m and M in a single system, the objects *individually contribute* to the kinetic energy, so that they simply add as
    1/2 m s^2 + 1/2 M S^2,
    where s and S are the speeds of the two masses m and M *with respect to a single reference frame*. This is therefore true in the special case of the double pendulum, where it's usually simpler to write the linear speeds "s" in terms of the rotational speed
    d(Angle)/dt.
     
  4. Oct 18, 2007 #3
    Actually I do not even think it is true that you can just add the KE due to one to the KE due to the other angle. You need to express x and y in terms of the angles and then add the squares of their derivatives.
     
  5. Oct 18, 2007 #4

    nrqed

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    I guess that by "angles" you really mean the two *objects*!! (It makes no sense to me to talk about the energy of angle! There is the energy of a mass whose position is described by an angle).

    You are correct that we always start from an *inertial frame* to calculate the kinetic energies of the objects. And *then* we rexpress those energies in terms of the generalized coordinates. This way there is no double counting problems.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?