Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Generator in orbit

  1. Dec 30, 2012 #1
    I had a thought. Without friction, the conductor in between the magnet would spin indefinitely in orbit (free of gravity). Tell me where im going wrong
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 30, 2012 #2
    Well, first of all, the generator would slow down anyways, because it outputs energy and thus must lose energy.

    Second, space, contrary to popular belief, is not truly devoid of matter, its "atmosphere" is just very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very thin. The Second Law tells us that we can't have a truly frictionless system, too.
     
  4. Dec 30, 2012 #3
    Are you trying to say that the rotor in a generator will spin freely or with less drag?
    You still need force to induce current into those coils, it's still going to be like pushing two positive poles of two strong magnets together.
    Your gonna still have to put in a bit more energy than you get out.
     
  5. Dec 30, 2012 #4
    Oh i see, so the actual current that is induced will remove energy from the motion?
     
  6. Dec 30, 2012 #5

    Drakkith

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Yes. It takes work to cause current to flow, and this work is done by turning the magnet. If you stop applying a force to turn the magnet it will quickly stop.
     
  7. Dec 31, 2012 #6

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    I have been asked this question a number of times, usually by highschool students. They seem to be under the impression that there would be no friction "in orbit" which just isn't true.

    Obviously, any output will reduce the energy but even without that there will be resistance and so eventually, the mechanism will stop. There will, for one thing, be resistance in the wires. That has nothing to do with being in space. There will be no air resistance but there would still be friction at any rotating piece. And, while there will be no gravitational force, in order to have the mechanism work, instead of just falling apart, you will have some force holding the pieces together. And that will cause friction losses.
     
  8. Dec 31, 2012 #7

    CWatters

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Yes. See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenz's_law

    That's why it takes mechanical energy to spin a generator or dynamo that is connected to a load. It's not just a case of friction or air resistance that can be eliminated by putting the generator in space.

    You can also think of it as a consequence of the law of conservation of energy.
     
  9. Dec 31, 2012 #8
    What if we found a way to harness the earth magnetic field to create a source of energy? Would the eventually stop the rotation of the earths core? Would that be bad, other than not having any working compasses anymore?
     
  10. Dec 31, 2012 #9
    That would be bad, very bad. You see the Earth's core's magnetic rotations produce the Van Allen Belts. These Belts protect the Earth's atmosphere from particles moving close to the speed of light from the sun.
    van-allen-belt.jpg

    But to turn the Earth into a generator we would need to crash Venus and Mars into it. Generators get energy from resistance, any magnets that would have enough power to get resistance from the Earth's core would have to be a lot bigger than what we can make now, trust me I live near the world's largest.
     
  11. Dec 31, 2012 #10

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    "Harnessing" the Field would mean changing it (reducing it). There is a massive difference between a Field and Energy and it is usually this confusion that produces the perennial questions about endless sources of energy.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Generator in orbit
  1. Positron generator (Replies: 3)

  2. Entropy generation (Replies: 2)

  3. Formula of generators (Replies: 2)

  4. AC generator (Replies: 27)

Loading...