Say we have a vector field defined in R^3. That is, at every point p in R^3, we have the corresponding set (p, v(p)). In representing this field, as far as I can tell, we have a certain list of very general requirements. That seems to be(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

a.) an origin,

b.) three everywhere non-coplanar curves, call them c1, c2, c3.

Where "everywhere non-coplanar" means that at any given choice of parameters t1, t2, t3, then c1'(t1), c2'(t2), c3'(t3) form a linearly independent set.

The requirement (a.) is necessary in order for us to locate distinct points. The requirement (b.) gives us a way in which to measure the position of the points. I suppose this could work by saying that when you specify a point p = (p1,p2,p3), a three-tuple, then that means the point lies at the intersection of the planes perpendicular to the velocity vectors c1'(p1), c2'(p2), c3'(p3).

Similarly, (b.) also gives us a way to provide a basis at every point, since the basis at point p=(p1,p2,p3) can be written as c1'(p1), c2'(p2), c3'(p3).

Does this seem correct, and if not, what are the general requirements for a coordinate system?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Generic coordinate systems

Loading...

Similar Threads - Generic coordinate systems | Date |
---|---|

I Coordinate systems vs. Euclidean space | Dec 4, 2017 |

I Coordinate Charts | May 31, 2017 |

I Coordinate system vs ordered basis | May 27, 2017 |

Generic Intersection of non-planar Surfaces in R^4 | Apr 18, 2010 |

Genericity of Uniquness of a Solution to a System with Non-Linear Equations | Dec 11, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**