1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Genral question about velocity

  1. Jan 24, 2012 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    I have just started physics course and I have a kind of philosofical question.

    why do we measure velocity in metres per second and not by seconds per metre?.

    for instance a man walking 0.5 metre per second, would'nt it be best to describe him as walking for 2 seconds per metre?


    2. Relevant equations



    3. The attempt at a solution
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data



    2. Relevant equations



    3. The attempt at a solution
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 24, 2012 #2

    SammyS

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    If we did as you suggest then the velocity of a slower person would be larger than the velocity of a faster person.
     
  4. Jan 24, 2012 #3

    tiny-tim

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    welcome to pf!

    hi eagleye! welcome to pf! :smile:
    yes, we could …

    we could define that as his deeps, for example, so that he has a deeps of 2s/m …

    but then the faster he goes, the less his deeps is …

    wouldn't that be confusing? :wink:

    (oooh, also: velocity is a vector, so velocities have to add like vectors, and deepses won't add like vectors!)
     
  5. Jan 24, 2012 #4
    Yes, I better understand now, but my question is - is there any reason why we shouldn't use my method (s/m - "deeps" like you said) and develop all the kinematics formulas according to it, is there anything wrong with it? because for my understanding, velocity was firstly defined to measure the rate in which distance is changing throughout time, but is there no use at all for knowing how much time passes until an object is completing one unit of a distance?
     
  6. Jan 28, 2012 #5
    No one answered..
    Again is there any use for seconds per meter in any field of physics?
    Because I found somthing that uses this but I wan't to know if there are more uses for this and how to use it.
    this is the link to how to determine the distance away a lightning storm from only the sound of thunder that uses seconds per meter.
    http://askville.amazon.com/determin...nting-flash/AnswerViewer.do?requestId=1938252
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
  7. Jan 28, 2012 #6

    cepheid

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    All they're saying is that:

    time = distance / speed

    Hence:

    [tex] t_{sound} - t_{light} = \frac{d}{v_{sound}} - \frac{d}{c} [/tex]

    So basically to compute the distance, you take delay between lightning and thunder and divide it by (1/v - 1/c). If you want to take this quantity with dimensions of 1/speed and call it something else, you can, but there is no real added benefit.

    Edit: fixed equation

    Edit: elaborated, fixed error
     
  8. Jan 30, 2012 #7
    Then I understand that, to the best of your knoladge, there is no field in physics that uses a measurement of seconds per meter? (the one we called 'dibs' in this post)
     
  9. Jan 30, 2012 #8
    correct
    off of the top of my head I can't think of any reason why using units of seconds per meter would simplify anything
     
  10. Jan 31, 2012 #9

    NascentOxygen

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    There may be occasions where it is convenient to describe speed in these terms, but it would mess up other things if you defined velocity in sec/m. For example, acceleration is defined as time-rate-of-change of velocity.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Genral question about velocity
Loading...