- #1

- 140

- 0

- Thread starter Terilien
- Start date

- #1

- 140

- 0

- #2

- 9,954

- 1,136

You can try, for instance, http://www.mth.uct.ac.za/omei/gr/chap6/node11.html

This seems like a rather direct and straightforwards approach to me, even more direct than MTW's. Of course it is a bit mathematically impure, in that it assumes a convenient coordinate system, but I think assuming an inertial coordinate system for one of the observers makes the physics more apparent.

This seems like a rather direct and straightforwards approach to me, even more direct than MTW's. Of course it is a bit mathematically impure, in that it assumes a convenient coordinate system, but I think assuming an inertial coordinate system for one of the observers makes the physics more apparent.

Last edited by a moderator:

- #3

- 2,946

- 0

The derivation I placed on my web page at

http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/gr/geodesic_deviation.htm

started out being a translation from Ohanian's book to my web page. However it seemed to end up being Ohanian's book and part of what I had to say since Ohanian made somethings hard to understand there. Enjoy. Any problems then e-mail me so we can set straight if there is something wrong.

Pete

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 600

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 619

- Last Post

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 776

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 646

- Replies
- 29

- Views
- 5K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 850

- Replies
- 14

- Views
- 4K

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 729