1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Geometric series

  1. Oct 27, 2005 #1
    This has been bothering me for a while. I've seen many different versions of this and I'd just like to get the following cleared up. Is the following true?

    \sum\limits_{k = 0}^N {r^k } = \frac{{1 - r^{N + 1} }}{{1 - r}}

    There are other related things I am slightly worried about but I can't remember what they are at the moment so I might post them later. In the mean time, any verification of the above formula that I have quoted would be good thanks.
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 27, 2005 #2


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    That is correct :smile:
  4. Oct 27, 2005 #3
    Ok thanks TD. I have another question and I realise that it usually depends on the convention adopted by the particular lecturer but other input shouldn't hurt. When we refer the the nth partial sum of a series. Do we take n >= 1? I mean with a series like [tex]\sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty {a_n } [/tex] it makes sense to take n>=1 but it seems to get awkward when the summation is started at zero instead.

    Anyway suppose that when we refer to the nth partial sum of a series we take n>=1 and that the Nth partial sum of the series I stated above is [tex]s_N = 1 + \frac{1}{{5^N }}[/tex]. Then is the Nth partial sum of the series [tex]\sum\limits_{n = 2}^\infty {a_n } [/tex] (I have replaced 1 by 2 as the starting index) [tex]s_N = \left( {1 + \frac{1}{{5^N }}} \right) + a_{N + 1} [/tex]. I just want to make sure of these things, I always screw up on relatively easy questions due to little technicalities.

    Just one more question. If I recall correctly then: [tex]f\left( x \right) = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^\infty {c_n \left( {x - a} \right)^n } \to f'\left( x \right) = \sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty {c_n n\left( {x - a} \right)^{n - 1} } [/tex]

    So in differentiating the series above, an index shift was required. Ok but what about the following series?
    f\left( x \right) = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^\infty {\frac{{\left( { - 1} \right)^n x^{2n + 1} }}{{\left( {2n + 1} \right)!}}} \to f'\left( x \right) = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^\infty {\frac{{\left( { - 1} \right)^n x^{2n} }}{{\left( {2n} \right)!}}}

    I find that only the first series that I quoted requires an index shift when I differentiate whereas other ones that I've encountered do not. Is there a reason for this?(I am aware of the first term in the first series being a constant and hence disappearing upon differentiation) Is it usually true that if you have a series for a function and you differentiate it inside the interval of convergence then no index shifts are required? Any help would be great.
    Last edited: Oct 27, 2005
  5. Oct 27, 2005 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    An index change is never necessary; always optional. When differentiating power series, it is customary to change the index from 0 to 1 because the oth term is 0 anyway.
  6. Oct 28, 2005 #5
    Thanks quasar, I see what you mean.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Geometric series
  1. Geometric series (Replies: 3)