1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Support PF! Reminder for those going back to school to buy their text books via PF Here!
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Geometry Geometry Revisited by Coxeter

  1. Strongly Recommend

    71.4%
  2. Lightly Recommend

    28.6%
  3. Lightly don't Recommend

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Strongly don't Recommend

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Jan 24, 2013 #1

    micromass

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award


    Table of Contents:
    Code (Text):

    [LIST]
    [*] Preface
    [*] Points and Lines Connected with a Triangle
    [LIST]
    [*] The extended Law of Sines
    [*] Ceva's theorem
    [*] Points of interest
    [*] The incircle and excircles
    [*] The Steiner-Lehmus theorem
    [*] The orthic triangle
    [*] The medial triangle and Euler line
    [*] The nine-point circle
    [*] Pedal triangles
    [/LIST]
    [*] Some Properties of Circles
    [LIST]
    [*] The power of a point with respect to a circle
    [*] The radical axis of two circles
    [*] Coaxal circles
    [*] More on the altitudes and orthocenter of a triangle
    [*] Simson lines
    [*] Ptolemy's theorem and its extension
    [*] More on Simson lines
    [*] The Butterfly
    [*] Morley's theorem
    [/LIST]
    [*] Collinearity and Concurrence
    [LIST]
    [*] Quadrangles; Varignon's theorem
    [*] Cyclic quadrangles; Brahmagupta's formula
    [*] Napoleon triangles
    [*] Menelaus's theorem
    [*] Pappus's theorem
    [*] Perspective triangles; Desargues's theorem
    [*] Hexagons
    [*] Pascal's theorem
    [*] Brianchon's theorem
    [/LIST]
    [*] Transformations
    [LIST]
    [*] Translation
    [*] Rotation
    [*] Half-turn
    [*] Reflection
    [*] Fagnano's problem
    [*] The three jug problem
    [*] Dilatation
    [*] Spiral similarity
    [*] A genealogy of transformations
    [/LIST]
    [*] An Introduction to Inversive Geometry
    [LIST]
    [*] Separation
    [*] Cross ratio
    [*] Inversion
    [*] The inversive plane
    [*] Orthogonality
    [*] Feuerbach's theorem
    [*] Coaxal circles
    [*] Inversive distance
    [*] Hyperbolic functions
    [/LIST]
    [*] An Introduction to Projective Geometry
    [LIST]
    [*] Reciprocation
    [*] The polar circle of a triangle
    [*] Conics
    [*] Focus and directrix
    [*] The projective plane
    [*] Central conics
    [*] Stereographic and gnomonic projection
    [/LIST]
    [*] Hints and Answers to Exercises
    [*] References
    [*] Glossary
    [*] Index
    [/LIST]
     
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 6, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 25, 2013 #2
    Good for high school math competitions. Almost all the topics are not covered in a standard high school math course.
     
  4. Jan 29, 2013 #3
    The Book is used for AMC VIII to AMC XII.The best book ever written for Mathematics Olympiad Geometry.
     
  5. Feb 14, 2013 #4
    It seems that the best thing people can say about this book is that it helps you to win high school math competitions.

    I read this book after finishing my undergraduate degree in mathematics. I found it enjoyable, but I preferred Coxeter's Introduction to Geometry because it had more depth and breadth.
     
  6. Feb 14, 2013 #5

    mathwonk

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    I agree. I am not nuts about this book. Winning contests involves using facts that you may not understand fully how to prove. This book is like that. E.g. the discussion of the "power of the point" claims correctly that this theorem of Euclid is an easy corollary of the principle of similarity. True enough.

    However what they do not mention is that the theory of similarity is quite deep, and was not available to Euclid when he proved this theorem, so he gave a different proof using Pythagoras. Indeed if one uses Euclid's proof, then one can use this result to deduce the important principle of similarity without going to as much difficulty as is usually done.

    If like me you are interested in the logical connections between different results, then you believe in doing them in logical order, not assuming the most difficult and deep ones first without justification, and then using them to make other results appear easy.

    If however you want to solve contest problems quickly, then you want to use all the big guns available on the littlest peanut problems, in order to dispatch them in enough time to finish the test with the highest possible score. There is no harm in this, and I was myself so motivated in high school, but not so much any more.
     
  7. Feb 24, 2013 #6
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Geometry Revisited by Coxeter
  1. Algebraic Geometry (Replies: 1)

  2. Geometry textbook (Replies: 15)

  3. Geometry book (Replies: 2)

  4. Riemannian Geometry (Replies: 3)

Loading...