Getting a patent

  • Thread starter deep838
  • Start date
  • #1
117
0
What should I do in order to get a recognition for a method I came up with?
Should I get a patent? If yes, then how?
If no, then what should I do to tell the world that I came up with the method?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
20,149
3,722
What should I do in order to get a recognition for a method I came up with?
Should I get a patent? If yes, then how?
If no, then what should I do to tell the world that I came up with the method?
A patent is an exclusive right to a product or process (method) that must fulfill three requirements. It must be 1) new, 2) useful, and 3) non-obvious. New means that it has not been done before, useful means that it has utility, and non-obvious means that it no current practitioner would think of it or develop it independently given the state-of-the-art.

When obtaining a patent, one must perform a review of the background to be sure that the product or process has not been described previously. One would also have to file patents in various jurisdictions.

If one does not seek a patent, one can publish one's method in an appropriate journal.
 
  • #4
22,129
3,298
Ok... my method is of squaring a number described here at: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=4326115#post4326115
It does meet the criteria you mentioned. Which journals would be "appropriate"? Where should I go to file a patent? the court?

It is very nice that you discovered such a trick. You should feel proud.
That said, no journal is going to be interested and there is no way to patent your discovery. Just feel happy that you discovered something nice.
 
  • #6
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
2021 Award
27,686
11,961
I'm afraid it fails all three criteria: it's not new, it's not useful, and it's obvious.
 
  • #7
117
0
Well I am happy that I did find it, but everyone I asked, said that they never heard of this method... so I thought it was a new one! sorry for the trouble. But thanks anyway for your replies. :) But how can you clain that its not useful and that its obvious??? Its a far better way than doing (a+b)^2 and if it had been obvious, then at least some of the people I asked should have known about it! Btw I'd like to know, who found this method beforehand?
 

Related Threads on Getting a patent

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
639
  • Last Post
2
Replies
31
Views
12K
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • Last Post
3
Replies
58
Views
30K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
691
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Top