For photon gas chemical potential is zero. It is because derivate of free energy with respect to number (T, V fixed) of particles is zero in equilibrium. (free energy has minimum).(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I was wondering why cannot I apply this reasoning to conclude (wrong) that chemical potential is zero for any Bose gas?

Explanation:

When deriving Bose statistics one applies Gibbs distribution for variable number of particles (grand canonical) to set of particles in the gas which are in a given quantum state. Then apply formula for grand potential (equal to -PV), mean number of particles in given quantum state is then obtained as derivate of grand potential with respect to chemical potential. So one gets Bose distribution. But if I say now that chemical potential is equal to derivate of free energy with respect to number of particles and latter is equal to zero (when gas is in equilibrium) I get wrong conclusion. Why?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

# Gibbs distribution and Bose statistics

Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email,
Google+,
Twitter, or
Facebook

Have something to add?

- Similar discussions for: Gibbs distribution and Bose statistics

Loading...

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**