For photon gas chemical potential is zero. It is because derivate of free energy with respect to number (T, V fixed) of particles is zero in equilibrium. (free energy has minimum).(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I was wondering why cannot I apply this reasoning to conclude (wrong) that chemical potential is zero for any Bose gas?

Explanation:

When deriving Bose statistics one applies Gibbs distribution for variable number of particles (grand canonical) to set of particles in the gas which are in a given quantum state. Then apply formula for grand potential (equal to -PV), mean number of particles in given quantum state is then obtained as derivate of grand potential with respect to chemical potential. So one gets Bose distribution. But if I say now that chemical potential is equal to derivate of free energy with respect to number of particles and latter is equal to zero (when gas is in equilibrium) I get wrong conclusion. Why?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Gibbs distribution and Bose statistics

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Gibbs distribution Bose | Date |
---|---|

I Laue Diffraction Intensity Distribution | Nov 28, 2017 |

Gibbs and Helmholtz energies of a superconductor | Jun 29, 2015 |

Gibbs Free Energy in Superconductors | Mar 3, 2015 |

Gibbs free energy and enthalpy relationship | Dec 28, 2013 |

Gibbs Free Energy and the Grand Potential | Aug 12, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**