Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death

  1. SOS2008

    SOS2008 1,554
    Gold Member

    http://www.law.ou.edu/hist/sedact.html

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11345744/
    http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=100199563 1

    Trotsky? Reminds me of this:

    This is from a speech by former CIA officer Jim Marcinkowski, now running for Congress in Michigan's 8th District. These remarks were delivered in Washtenaw County, Michigan on February 8, 2006. He was referring to the now dissolved Soviet Union.

    http://www.8thdistrictdems.org/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=297&Itemid=62
     
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2006
  2. jcsd
  3. No links? No court ruling? What's to discuss, idle speculations?
     
  4. Hurkyl

    Hurkyl 16,090
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I don't understand the point of having three disconnected thoughts all in one post either.
     
  5. It's very clear the point, and it's that the us each day looks more like the URSS or like a totalitarian state..

    90% of the points of the speach of Jim Marcinkowski (atributed then to the URSS) are now happening in the US..
     
  6. SOS2008

    SOS2008 1,554
    Gold Member

    For members who aren't capable of independent thought, meaningful discourse, or reading on the subject, this is currently under investigation by the ACLU:

    http://aclu.org/freespeech/gen/24043prs20060131.html

    The thought that you or I could be convicted of sedition is outrageous and a little too similar to a kind of society we claim we are not. :bugeye:
     
  7. I couldn't resist:

    - Where lying was considered a patriotic skill
     
  8. Hurkyl

    Hurkyl 16,090
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    No it's not. It's three disconnected thoughts all lumped together. Juxtaposition is a common propaganda technique. Learn to resist. :tongue:

    Would you care to argue that? The OP certainly didn't even begin such an argument.

    Would you care to tally them up? And explain why it would be relevant at all?
     
  9. Hurkyl

    Hurkyl 16,090
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I certainly don't have plans to advocate violent overthrow of the government, so that thought doesn't even strike me.
     
  10. You think is irrelevant that your country is now doing each thing that made the soviet union a totalitarian country.??

    If you want we can go to each point.. i will tell you wich points i think they are now in the US, then tell me where you disagree...

    --------------------------
    Ok those are the point now i think are taking place in the us. some of course for example:
    State incarceration was not subject to the checks and balances of a legal system;
    Are not 100% but they are being implemented at some extent..
     
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2006
  11. SOS2008

    SOS2008 1,554
    Gold Member

    Since you don't want to take your time to read links, or find sources on your own, or reflect upon this topic, I'll waste more of my time and try to spell it out for you.

    To begin, this is a story reported in the news that is related to politics. It is about an American citizen being investigated for sedition. In view of the ongoing suppression of dissent in this country, this is just another example of how our country is looking more and more like a totalitarian state (for which there a list of such actions in recent years). Suppression of dissent is an important issue in a democracy. Apparently you and others don’t grasp this.

    It is obvious from your quick replies that you are not interested in a meaningful discussion. You do not have to participate in this thread, and I would prefer that you don’t if you aren’t going to contribute in a meaningful way.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalitarian
     
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2006
  12. Hurkyl

    Hurkyl 16,090
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    It's difficult to have a meaningful discussion when nobody presents an argument. And since you and Burnsys seem keen on having such a discussion, y'all should go first. :tongue:
     
  13. Hurkyl

    Hurkyl 16,090
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Sure. But like any other right, the right to dissent has its limits. I believe that violent overthrow is one of those things a government should be allowed to prevent.
     
  14. SOS2008

    SOS2008 1,554
    Gold Member

    Back to the topic:

    http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001995631

    Americans should be shocked to see that word.
     
  15. Civilian public employee? Sounds like fair game to me.
     
  16. SOS2008

    SOS2008 1,554
    Gold Member

    Come on towns folk, go git yer ropes. We gotta hangin' to tend to! :rofl: DNFTT
     
  17. cronxeh

    cronxeh 1,232
    Gold Member

    Non-violent sedition is our constitutional right! I cant imagine how dangerous a VA nurse can be, writing all those letters.. oh boy she must've freaked the editor out :biggrin:
     
  18. The OP refers to a woman investigated for sedition for writing a letter, critical of the gov't, to the editor of a newspaper.

    This apparent attempt to suppress freedom of speech is reminiscent of the practices employed within the old USSR. To see if there is a further correlation between the USA of today and the USSR of yesteryear SOS listed the 'negative' characteristics which defined the USSR and as can be seen there are a lot of similarities

    This is obviously critical of the current admin. and as it is a popular GOP strategy these days to label it's detractors as being unpatriotic the final quote is to avoid that particular rebuttal by demonstrating that in the opinion of one of America's most respected presidents the opposite is true.

    I'm sure most folk here have had no problem connecting the dots and some may see your responses as mere deliberate obfuscations rather than as serious contributions to an interesting political topic.
     
  19. Hurkyl

    Hurkyl 16,090
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I anything I've read, the letter was never described as being merely critical.


    Analogies are good for clarifying an argument. They cannot serve as a replacement for one.


    When someone is trying to make a point, the burden is in them to present an argument. It is not on the listener to try and string together an argument for that person.

    In other words. I can't obfuscate something that isn't there. :tongue: There may very well be an interesting discussion to be had, and I'm trying to wring it out of the OP.
     
  20. BobG

    BobG 2,333
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    This link (http://progressive.org/mag_mc020806) probably provides a better idea of what Berg actually wrote.

    One note about the link to the Sedition Act of 1798. Was it extended past March 3, 1801?

    In any event, Sec 2 of the act seems a little overly broad. Sedition is incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority. Berg's letter urged lawful authorities to bring charges against the Bush administration. That doesn't meet the criteria of sedition.
     
  21. Moonbear

    Moonbear 12,265
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Right now, the OP is nothing but a series of quotes with no supporting argument or thesis to them. Without a clear indication of a direction of argument, there is nothing here to discuss.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook