Not sure if this is appropriate here or the differential geometry forum, but anyway....(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I've got a Kahler potential and from that can compute it's metric and then move onto the dynamics of the fields which the potential is a function of. One of the terms I consider is [tex]K_{a\bar{b}}\dot{\Phi}^{a}\dot{\Phi}^{\bar{b}}[/tex] where [tex]\Phi[/tex] is a complex field.

Now instead of considering the complex metric [tex]K_{a\bar{b}}[/tex] I want to go a point of view involving just real fields, though obviously twice as many. Papers I've read and books I've flicked through just seem to say "And [tex]G_{ij}[/tex] is the metric associated with the real representation of the Kahler potential" or words to that effect. Problem is, I'm not sure how to compute it, but have a guess by the following logic :

Let K be a function of n complex fields [tex]\Phi[/tex] and so by definition of metric :

[tex]ds^{2} = K_{a\bar{b}}d\Phi^{a} d\Phi^{\bar{b}} = G_{ij}d\phi^{i}d\phi^{j}[/tex]

where [tex]\Phi^{a} = \phi^{a} + i\phi^{a+n}[/tex]. Putting that into the Kahler form gives

[tex]K_{a\bar{b}}(d\phi^{a} + id\phi^{a+n})(d\phi^{a} - id\phi^{a+n}) = K_{ab}d\phi^{a}d\phi^{b}+K_{ab}d\phi^{a+n}d\phi^{b+n} = G_{ij}d\phi^{i}d\phi^{j}[/tex]

Matching efficents of [tex]d\phi^{i}d\phi^{j}[/tex] gives [tex]G_{ab} = K_{ab} = G_{a+n \, b+n}[/tex]

This then gives the general form

[tex]G_{ij} = \left( \begin{array}{cc}K_{ab} & 0 \\ 0 & K_{ab} \end{array} \right) [/tex]

This seems to make sense, is it correct?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Going from a complex rep to a real rep

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**