Going Over Some Old Problems.

  • Thread starter redhot209
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation was about reviewing old physics problems and asking for help in understanding them. The first problem involved finding the minimum area of an ice floe to support a polar bear in saltwater. The second problem dealt with calculating the pressure at a valve based on changes in cross-sectional area and flow rate in a pipe. The third problem involved determining the rate of water flow from a hole in a water storage tank. The last problem was about finding the weight of an object that floats in water with a specific percentage above the waterline. The answers to these problems were 4.0m^2, 0.235 atm, 5.4 x 10^5 m^3/s, and 7,840 N
  • #1
redhot209
12
0
Ok so, I was reviewing some of my old physics problems, to understand it better. I have no clue how I did these problems, so I was wondering if anyone can help me?
1. A polar bear of mass 200 kg stands on an ice floe 100 cm thick. What is the minimum area of the floe that will just support the bear in saltwater of specific gravity of 1.03? The specific gravity of ice is 0.98.
The Answer was 4.0m^2
2. Water flows through a horizontal pipe of cross-sectional area 10.0 cm^2 at a pressure of 0.250 atm. the flow rate is 1.00 X10^-3 m^3/s. At a valve, the effective cross-secitonal area of the pipe is reduced to 5.00 cm^2. what is the pressure at the valve?
The Answer was 0.235 atm
3. A hole of radius 1.00 mm occurs in the bottom of a water storage tank that holds water a a depth of 15m. At what rate will water flow out of the hole?
The Answer was 5.4 x 10^5 m^3/s
4. A 1.0-m^3 object floats in water with 20% of it above the waterline. What does the object weigh out of the water?
The Answer was 7,840 N
Sorry, I know this is a lot of work, but it would very helpful thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Actually, this is about ten minutes worth of work. Any ideas how you would do any of these?
 
  • #3


As a scientist, it is great to see that you are reviewing your old physics problems to better understand them. It shows dedication and a desire to improve your knowledge. I can definitely help you with these problems.

1. To determine the minimum area of the ice floe that will support the polar bear, we need to consider the forces acting on the bear. The weight of the bear is balanced by the buoyant force of the water and the weight of the ice floe. We can use the equation Fb = ρghA, where Fb is the buoyant force, ρ is the specific gravity of the water, g is the acceleration due to gravity, h is the depth of the water, and A is the area of the ice floe. We also know that the weight of the bear is equal to its mass times the acceleration due to gravity (W = mg). Setting these two equations equal to each other and solving for A, we get A = (W - ρghA) / (ρg). Plugging in the given values, we get A = (200 kg)(9.8 m/s^2 - (1.03)(0.98)(9.8 m/s^2)(1m)) / ((1.03)(9.8 m/s^2)) = 4.0 m^2.

2. To find the pressure at the valve, we can use the continuity equation, which states that the flow rate (Q) is equal to the product of the cross-sectional area (A) and the velocity (v) of the fluid (Q = Av). Since we know the flow rate and the initial cross-sectional area, we can solve for the velocity. Then, we can use the Bernoulli's equation, which states that the sum of the pressure (P), kinetic energy (1/2ρv^2), and potential energy (ρgh) of the fluid is constant (P + 1/2ρv^2 + ρgh = constant). We can use this equation at two points in the pipe - before and after the valve - and equate them to find the pressure at the valve. Solving for P, we get P = ρgh + 1/2ρv^2 = (1.03)(9.8 m/s^2)(0.1 m) + 1/2(1.03)(v^2) =
 

1. What is the purpose of "Going Over Some Old Problems"?

The purpose of "Going Over Some Old Problems" is to review and further understand concepts and theories that have already been learned. It also helps to identify any areas of weakness and reinforce knowledge.

2. How often should one go over old problems?

It is recommended to go over old problems at least once a week. However, the frequency may vary depending on individual needs and the complexity of the subject.

3. Is going over old problems beneficial for learning?

Yes, going over old problems is a beneficial learning technique. It helps to reinforce concepts and improve retention of information. It also allows for identification and correction of mistakes.

4. How should one approach going over old problems?

One should approach going over old problems by first reviewing the concepts and theories related to the problems. Then, attempt to solve the problems independently before checking the solutions. Afterward, analyze any mistakes and make note of them for future reference.

5. Can going over old problems improve test scores?

Yes, going over old problems can improve test scores by strengthening understanding of concepts and identifying areas of weakness. It also helps to build confidence and reduce test anxiety.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
8K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
916
Back
Top