Why Do Good Absorbers Also Make Good Emitters?

  • Thread starter fog37
  • Start date
In summary: The 4th power dependency might play a role in how long it takes for a white object to reach thermal equilibrium with its absorbed energy.
  • #1
fog37
1,548
107
Hello Forum,

If a black object, being black, is a very good absorber or sunlight and at the same time a great emitter, why wouldn't it be cool? The total emission would seem to be the mechanism to remain cool. Maybe it works this way: if 100J of sunlight are absorbed, only a small % would be re-emitted? But then it would not be a good emitter...

A white object rejects all energy at all wavelengths from the very beginning and remains cool.

thanks,
fog37
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Think about the temperature dependence of the emission, T4, and balance power in and power out.
 
  • #3
Thanks.
I see how after a transient phase, the objects reaches thermal steady state where the absorbed energy = emitted energy and the temperature stabilizes.

Bystander, you bring the attention to the 4th power dependence of the temperature. So a white object stabilizes to its final temperature T_f earlier and T_f would be much lower than T_f for a black object. The black object takes longer to reach T_f and during that time it absorbs a lot of energy and warms up before it can emit an equal amount of energy out...

Still, I am not sure how the 4th power dependency plays a role...any other hint?

thanks,
fog37
 
  • #4
fog37 said:
T_f earlier and T_f would be much lower than T_f for a black object.
If both have the same heat capacity and the same areas exposed to radiative heat exchange? Maybe.

Expose a couple flat rocks to the sun (~1 kW/m2). At steady state, each radiates at the same rate it absorbs energy, and that rate is a function of temperature (Stefan-Boltzmann), dq/dt = (5.67 x 10-8W/m2) εT4, where ε is a function of temperature and of the material (black rock, white rock for the case you've described).

At what temperature shall we evaluate ε for our absorbing-radiating surfaces? We'll certainly use the temperatures of the surfaces for emission, and get ~ 450 W/m2 for black body (ε = 1) at 300 K, and expect the black rock to radiate more than the white rock (ε < 1).

What about absorbtion? Source temperature (if it's a black body source). The sun is a nearly black-body, not perfect, and ε for most materials at 5600 K is approaching 1. "But the white rock is reflecting white light?" It's not reflecting all the white (visible) light. Does it have to get warmer than the black rock to emit the heat it absorbs at steady state?

Bottom line? Black rock vs. white rock in the sun? Which is cooler? I have not done the experiment --- my curiosity is aroused.

Reflecting surfaces? Burned your arm on chrome trim on automobiles? Literally, it will blister you. How? It's a very good reflector, blindingly bright reflections when driving in daytime. How does it get so hot? Bright metal surfaces have very low emissivities at ambient temperatures, ε = 0.01 to 0.1, ordinarily a few hundredths, and they simply do not radiate any of the energy they absorb, and there's plenty of energy in the solar spectrum outside the visible range for them to absorb. The only cooling automotive chrome trim gets is by conduction and convection to the rest of the auto body and to the air around it.

Planck's radiation law, Wien displacement, and Stefan-Boltzmann are good places to start reading. Emissivities? Rohsenow & Hartnett for temperature dependent values for a variety of surfaces, Eshbach's Handbook and CRC Handbook, for tabulations, Perry's maybe. Emissivities are functions not only of temperature, but surface preparation and history, and you will find disparities in the tabulated values.

Temperature dependence of emissivity is the biggest stumbling block to "blind" use of Stefan-Boltzmann for calculation of radiation from black, gray, and tattle-tale gray bodies; measured values of emissivities are the second largest problem.

Sorry to be answering your question about radiative heat transfer with far bigger questions. Some of this should help you at least understand what's going on with some problems/systems.
 
  • #5
Thanks Bystander.

Your answers are very helpful. I know that two different objects can have the same temperature T but, when touched, feel very different depending on their thermal conductivity. The classic example is the bathroom tiles feeling colder than the rest of the object in the bathroom regardless of all the objects having the same T. Thermal energy flows quickly away from the human body toward the tiles. That rapid heat subtraction makes us judge the tiles as "colder" than the other objects (regardless of them having the same T). I am rather clear on how thermal conductivity. Metals are not black, in general, but if we touch them after they have been left in sunlight for many hours, we would get burned (due to the metal high thermal conductivity).

What I am still confused is the difference between a perfect black body (emissivity =1) and an ideal white body (emissivity=0). In the transient phase, both objects would have their temperature increase if left in sunlight. The temperature of the blackbody would increase fast and reach a larger final T in comparison to the ideal white body. At steady state, both objects will not experience any increase in T (energy in= energy out).

Maybe, after a long enough time, both objects will reach the same temperature? Consider a piece of wood and piece of metal left in sunlight for 10hrs.

I know that if the light source is removed, the blackbody will cool down much faster than the white body...fog37
 
  • #6
fog37 said:
both objects would have their temperature increase if left in sunlight.
"White body" is going to change T only if it is in contact with some other body (earth, air, whatever). An isolated white body isn't going to exchange any radiation with anything.
fog37 said:
Maybe, after a long enough time, both objects will reach the same temperature?
At equilibrium with the radiation source (in a closed system) they'll be at the temperature of the radiant source.
 

1. What does "good absorber = good emitter" mean?

"Good absorber = good emitter" refers to the ability of a material to absorb and emit radiation. This concept is based on Kirchhoff's law, which states that a good absorber of a certain wavelength of radiation is also a good emitter of that same wavelength. In other words, materials that can absorb a large amount of radiation also emit a large amount of radiation at the same wavelength.

2. How does the color of a material affect its ability to absorb and emit radiation?

The color of a material is directly related to its ability to absorb and emit radiation. Darker colors, such as black, are better absorbers and emitters of radiation compared to lighter colors. This is because dark colors are able to absorb a wider range of wavelengths, while lighter colors reflect more radiation.

3. Can a material be a good absorber but a poor emitter, or vice versa?

Yes, a material can be a good absorber but a poor emitter, or vice versa. This is because different materials have different spectral properties, meaning they can absorb and emit radiation at different wavelengths. For example, a material that is a good absorber of visible light may not be a good emitter of infrared radiation.

4. How does the surface texture of a material affect its ability to absorb and emit radiation?

The surface texture of a material can greatly affect its ability to absorb and emit radiation. Rough or textured surfaces have a larger surface area compared to smooth surfaces, allowing them to absorb and emit more radiation. This is why materials with textured surfaces, such as charcoal, are good absorbers and emitters of radiation.

5. Can the temperature of a material affect its ability to absorb and emit radiation?

Yes, the temperature of a material can greatly affect its ability to absorb and emit radiation. According to the Stefan-Boltzmann law, the amount of radiation emitted by a material is directly proportional to its temperature. This means that as the temperature of a material increases, so does its ability to absorb and emit radiation.

Similar threads

  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top