# Good bye, and Good Riddance .

1. Jun 3, 2004

### phatmonky

Good bye, and Good Riddance.....

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040603/D82VJOQG0.html

If I did my job as badly as Tenet did his, I would have been fired - not given a chance to resign.

2. Jun 3, 2004

### amp

He probably resigned so he can write a bestseller like O'Neil and Clarke did. And because his conscience was probably starting to bother him due to all the lying to cover for Bush.

3. Jun 3, 2004

### Loren Booda

Might this resignation have something to do with the recent leak of intelligence to Iran about decoding their communications?

4. Jun 3, 2004

### amp

Maybe, but after enduring the storm over the 9/11 intelligence failures it seems anticlimatic.

5. Jun 3, 2004

### kat

Phat- I tend to agree with you. I think the Bush should have cleaned house a lot better when he came into office. I think it served Clinton well to clean out the 1st Bush presidents appointees and fill it with his own people, I really don't get why Bush didn't follow the same route.

6. Jun 3, 2004

### kyleb

Tenet was the one guy in higher government who was telling us that going to Iraq was a bad idea, it is a shame to see him go.

7. Jun 3, 2004

### pelastration

http://www.kesq.com/Global/story.asp?S=1915479
(quote)A man who was once in the same shoes says he thinks Tenet was forced to resign. Former C-I-A Director Stansfield Turner tells C-N-N he doesn't think Tenet would have stepped down during an election year unless he was "told to do that".(end quote)

But, there may be several issues that can influence:

1. There is growing critic on CIA about the pre-9/11 period (not able to prevent).
But remember CIA gave a report to Bush (who went then on vacation). Before 9/11 Tenet warned against Al-Qaeda and something major to come.

2. WMD: CIA didn't confirm WMD presence in Iraq, but was forced too.
Remember the Feith/Wurmser cell (PNAC) in the Pentagon that fabricated conclusions (about Iraq) which were opposed by CIA field fact. Also CIA warned against the Nigeria papers.

3. CIA opposed to Wolfowitz/Rumsfeld friend Chalabi (who also fabricated 'proves'). Secretary of State Colin Powell recently pressed the CIA to account for the faulty intelligence that led Powell to tell the United Nations last year that Iraq definitely possessed illicit weapons (mobile biological weapons laboratories) but the sources were Iraqi defectors introduced to intelligence agencies by Ahmad Chalabi's Iraqi National Congress.

4. You have the Tenet-Plan to ease tensions between Israel and the Palestinians. Bush torpedoed it by his "Thank You, Ari!" -policy.

5. Then you have the (coming) information about the CIA/OGA's role in Abu Ghraib. It's unsure what this will bring.

6. What about the reorganization of the intelligence agencies. For sure there is a power game happening, but also for example CIA concern that it's sources would come in other hands (biggest fear of a spy organization). Remember the 'show' of Attorney General John Ashcroft and FBI Director Robert Mueller last week, but who was passed: Tenet (CIA) and Tom Ridge from Homeland Security. Power Games.

7. Speculation: Who knows that now again CIA gave warnings that Bush and PNAC deny or judge lite. Maybe Tenet don't want that under his name for another time.

From his position Tenet could not criticize publicly the President or defend the CIA against unjust allegations. A loyal servant of the United States and it's President.
Now many - such as Powell - point the CIA for the failures the PNAC-guys made.

IMO these points gave Tenet indeed personal problems. It seems "too much is too much".

Last edited: Jun 3, 2004
8. Jun 3, 2004

### Njorl

Tenet's biggest failure was not cutting off Cheney, Feith and Cambone from raw intelligence data they should not have seen. The Office of Special Plans was the biggest source of fraudulent intelligence concerning the Iraq war. Not just wrong, fraudulent. Tenet's only connection to it was his allowance of data to be sent to them. The OSP manipulated intelligence to get the war they wanted. The OSP was formed by Cheney and run by Feith. This is the same Douglas Feith that General Tommy Franks called "..the stupidest man in the world..."

The White House was poorly served by Tenet's CIA because it demanded that it be poorly served. Tenet's fault was giving in to that demand.

Njorl

9. Jun 3, 2004

### pelastration

But they used a trick to get highly classified material, which Wurmser ( closely linked to Israel's Likud)- who had not that clearance - could 'study' as raw data (including all junk of double-spies, rumors, etc. that CIA normally filters before internal use). Isn't that illegal? How is it called?

(quote) Despite their access to the Pentagon leadership, Maloof and Wurmser faced resistance from the CIA and Defense Intelligence Agency.

They were initially denied access, for example, to the most highly classified documents in the Pentagon computer system. So Maloof returned regularly to his old office in another branch of the Department of Defense, where he still could get the material.(end quote)

http://www.iht.com/articles/517591.html

I don't say Wurmser works for the Shin Bet but he had highly classified information - illicitly received without clearance - that could interest many people, like his good friend Benjamin Netanyahu.
Shin Bet http://www.fas.org/irp/world/israel/shin_bet/

On Wurmser - actually Cheney's Top advisor on the Middle East - and Netanyahu: http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=David_Wurmser
Also : http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=2727
Wurmser was also a stronger supporter of Ahmad Chalabi.

And this guy is now designing the USA policy in the Middle East! :grumpy:

10. Jun 3, 2004

### Njorl

11. Jun 4, 2004

### amp

Look whos in charge of Afganistan, former executives of Unicol, and the pipeline is going to be built. Which is what was wanted in the first place since millions had already been invested. Source - Michael Moore - Wheres my country?

12. Jun 4, 2004

### phatmonky

Unocal, not Unicol - Do you suggest that the attack on Afghanistan, supported by the world in a very large majority, was all a ploy to help the USA build a pipeline (which would be built anyways, considering Taliban representatives were at the location I worked at negotiatiing such a deal a year before 9/11!). Or did we just manipulate everyone, and then lose that ability with Iraq?

13. Jun 4, 2004

### amp

YES, I READ THAT Taliban reps were in Texas (were they at the Bush ranch?) before 9/11 to negotiate a deal to get some 16 billion  for the pipeline.

14. Jun 4, 2004

### phatmonky

They were in Sugarland (near Houston) meeting with UNOCAL execs - and all was going well on the deal.
The war wasn't needed to secure the deal.
The war, from a profiteering point, would only be good if security was guaranteed, and instantaneous, as UNOCAL already had other vested interests in Afghanistan that would/were interrupted by the war.

15. Jun 4, 2004

### pelastration

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A14025-2004Jun3.html
(quote)
...
White House officials have sought to blame Tenet for leading the president into war based on bad intelligence. But even before the intelligence community had produced its definitive reports on Iraq, Vice President Cheney and other top administration officials were describing the threat from Saddam Hussein in more dramatic and unequivocal terms than the intelligence ever supported.

Tenet's relationship with White House staff members grew tense when he refused to take sole blame for an inaccurate statement about Iraq in the president's State of the Union address in 2003. It worsened after a speech by Tenet at Georgetown University in February, in which he pointed out that the agency had never used the word "imminent" to characterize the threat from Hussein's weapons.
...
(end quote)

16. Jun 4, 2004