Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Google Chrome OS

  1. Jul 8, 2009 #1
    http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article6665703.ece


    *mod edit: fixed for copyright compliance*
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 8, 2009
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 8, 2009 #2

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Re: Go GOOGLE!

    Google is getting as bad as Microsoft, perhaps worse. The loss of analog tv in the US was largely due to millions of dollars worth of lobbying by Google so that they could get the bandwidth for a cell phone company they wanted to start.

    Google seems determined to monopolize the entire communications industry.
     
  4. Jul 8, 2009 #3
    Re: Go GOOGLE!

    Yes, thats what I was thinking. Its pretty cool to have a direct competitor to Microsoft and have a real choice, but what to stop Google from being the next Microsoft?
     
  5. Jul 8, 2009 #4

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Re: Go GOOGLE!

    Exactly, they're doing this to make money. Of course that's what companies do. I think Google is getting a bit too big.

    Of course more options can be a good thing. No problem for a home user, but I see yet another OS as a nightmare for companies that need to have seemless integration.
     
  6. Jul 8, 2009 #5
    Still, a commercial (and free) alternative to Windows would be heaven sent. I absolutely hate Windows and would have switched to Linux already, but my sister also uses this computer and well, I would have been offered as blood sacrifice to Microsoft for switching over to anything that requires more than a mouse for her to use. Hopefully Chrome OS will at least be bug free seeing as its going to be an open source OS.
     
  7. Jul 8, 2009 #6

    Borek

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Somehow I doubt in the fast success of the OS. But everyone trying to disrupt M$ monopole deserves applause.

    Even if it is other monopole. When there are two monopoles, they are no longer monopoles.
     
  8. Jul 8, 2009 #7

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    It will be interesting to see. Linux is great. I hate how dumbed down the home version of XP is. I'm spoiled with the professional version, although it's still a major disappointment compared to their NT version. That was so logical and intuitive, then our sys admin decided that we'd switch to Windows 95. :cry:
     
  9. Jul 9, 2009 #8

    ranger

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I think this is awesome what Google is doing. I am very eager to see how they will change the design of operating systems with Chrome OS. Google Wave is a very nice modern approach to redesigning how we use emails and it will be interesting to how the OS would be redesigned.
     
  10. Jul 9, 2009 #9
    What I don't understand is why ChromeOS is using the Linux kernel? Who needs another Linux distribution? Why not create something new for a change?

    It also echoes my frustration with bing. Sure, sure, "decision-engine" blah blah, competition with Google and Yahoo, blah blah. It's all fine for the companies. Of course, they need to compete. But for the end user, why do we even want something that's pretty much...been there, done that? It frustrates the consumer because it's another thing to worry about and in reality, doesn't offer anything new. Can't companies create something new for a change?

    We have Windows, Mac OS and Linux basically, why create another Chrome OS to throw into the mix (which uses the linux kernel, that I still don't get)? Similarly, when Apple released iPod, Microsoft had to compete by releasing Zune. Again, why can't companies stop making the same darn thing and compete by making something new (i.e., expanding into a different market)?
     
  11. Jul 9, 2009 #10

    mgb_phys

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Because it's there ? They don't fancy repeating 15years of Linux development by 1000s of programmers to support 1000s of devices.
    Take a unix kernel that works, put a pretty desktop in front of it and you have a winning product - at least if you put a silhouette of a fruit on the back
     
  12. Jul 9, 2009 #11
    Most of current technology looks like a big chunk to me and many idiots who are willing to spend money on it IMO.

    I wanted to make a thread about this few days ago if they have too much of capital (including talent) and now are just wasting resources...
     
  13. Jul 9, 2009 #12

    mgb_phys

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    There are now more cell phones than computers, there are more TVs than both put together, soon more people will access the net through their phone (or TV) than a computer. The biggest growth area in computers are cheap laptops for online use.
    With people accessing the web through general purpose computers it doesn't matter to Google who built them or what OS they run.
    But once people accept the restrictions on cell phones (like the appstore) they might accept a MS based phone only including IE or which can only search bing.
    Google are not happy about the prospect of HW or SW makers and service providers locking users in.
     
  14. Jul 24, 2009 #13
    Well, like so many things, software is a monopoly/oligopoly. Way of the world, only the most extremely wealth start-ups could ever afford to make a significant dent in the market share.
     
  15. Jul 24, 2009 #14

    mgb_phys

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Or geeky scandanvian kids in their dormroom.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Google Chrome OS
  1. Google Chrome (Replies: 12)

Loading...