GPS and Relativity: Impact of Time Dilation on Earth and Satellites

In summary, the conversation discusses time dilation due to gravity and velocity, with equations and quantities provided for further understanding. The total time dilation on Earth is 38.35334 microseconds per day, while the ISS experiences a time dilation of 24.35197 to 25.8877 microseconds per day. The non-sphericity of the Earth and its orbital velocity are also mentioned.
  • #1
stevebd1
Insights Author
Gold Member
750
41
Due to the blogs being removed, I thought it might be worthwhile posting a few in the forums-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQdIjwoi-u4


Time dilation due to gravity (GR)-

[tex]d\tau=dt\sqrt{1-\frac{2M}{r}}[/tex]

where [itex]M=Gm/c^2[/itex]

Time dilation due to velocity (SR)-

[tex]d\tau=dt\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}[/tex]

Quantities-

Earth's mass- 5.9736e+24 kg

Earth's (mean) radius- 6.371e+6 m

Satellite's altitude- 2e+7 m

Satellite's velocity- 3.889e+3 m/s

86400 seconds in a day


Difference due to gravity-

dT sat (r=6.371e+6 + 2e+7)- 0.999999999833
dT Earth (r=6.371e+6)- 0.999999999304

difference- 0.000000000529

Time dilation on Earth relative to satellite is 4.562265e-05 seconds per day or 45.62265 microseconds


Difference due to velocity-

dT sat (v=3.889e+3)- 0.999999999916
dT Earth- 1 (0.999999999999 at the equator, i.e. ~1)

difference- 0.000000000084

Time dilation on satellite relative to Earth is 7.26931e-06 seconds per day or 7.26931 microseconds


Total time dilation- 38.35334 microseconds per day on Earth, atomic clocks on satellites need to be slowed down to match atomic clocks on Earth.



The ISS-

altitude- 2.78e+5 to 4.6e+5 m

velocity- 7701.11 m/s

The time dilation on the ISS relative to Earth is between 24.35197 and 25.8877 microseconds a day (depending on the altitude) meaning the atomic clocks on the ISS have to be speeded up to match those on Earth in contrast to the GPS satellites (which means that since its inception in 1998, the ISS has traveled forward in time by approx. 0.1 of a second).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
A few comments:

(1) You didn't mention it, so I don't know if you are taking into account that an object on the Earth's equator has a nonzero velocity (at least in the frame you appear to be using for your calculations, in which the Earth is assumed to be spherical and non-rotating). Since ##v \approx 450## in SI units, the correction to dT(Earth) is only in the twelfth decimal place, but I think it's still worth mentioning.

(2) For objects that are in free-fall orbits, you can use the formula for orbital velocity in terms of Earth's mass and the orbital radius to get a formula that takes both velocity and altitude into account:

$$
d\tau = \sqrt{1 - \frac{3 G m}{c^2 r}}
$$

(3) It's worth noting that the correction due to the non-sphericity of the Earth is just a smidgen too small to appear in your calculation; it appears in the thirteenth decimal place (this is the correction due to the Earth's quadrupole moment). This illustrates why approximating the Earth as spherical works so well; even in a calculation this precise, non-sphericity can be ignored for many purposes (since the correction is well under 1 percent of the overall value).
 

1. How does time dilation affect GPS satellites?

Time dilation refers to the phenomenon where time passes at different rates for objects moving at different speeds. In the case of GPS satellites, which are moving at high speeds in orbit around the Earth, time dilation causes their onboard clocks to run slightly slower than clocks on Earth. This difference in time is taken into account in the calculations used for GPS positioning, as even a small difference can result in significant errors in location accuracy.

2. How does the theory of relativity play a role in GPS technology?

The theory of relativity, specifically the concept of time dilation, plays a crucial role in GPS technology. The theory states that time and space are relative to the observer's frame of reference, and this is taken into account in the calculations used to determine the precise location of GPS satellites and receivers. Without accounting for relativity, GPS technology would not be as accurate as it is today.

3. Can time dilation affect the accuracy of GPS navigation?

Yes, time dilation does have an impact on the accuracy of GPS navigation. As mentioned before, the small difference in time between the clocks on GPS satellites and on Earth can result in significant errors in location accuracy. However, scientists and engineers have developed sophisticated algorithms and systems to account for this difference and ensure that GPS navigation remains accurate and reliable.

4. Are there any other factors that can affect GPS accuracy aside from time dilation?

Yes, there are other factors that can affect GPS accuracy. These include atmospheric conditions, satellite geometry, and errors in the GPS receiver itself. However, time dilation is one of the most significant factors and is constantly accounted for in GPS technology to ensure accurate positioning.

5. How does time dilation affect other technologies aside from GPS?

Time dilation is a fundamental concept of the theory of relativity and can affect other technologies aside from GPS. For example, it is taken into account in satellite communication systems, which use highly precise clocks to maintain accurate communication between satellites and ground stations. Time dilation also plays a role in high-speed transportation systems, such as airplanes and spacecraft, and must be considered in their design and operation.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
101
Views
7K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
31
Views
406
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
132
Views
6K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
70
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
Back
Top