Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
General Math
Calculus
Differential Equations
Topology and Analysis
Linear and Abstract Algebra
Differential Geometry
Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
General Math
Calculus
Differential Equations
Topology and Analysis
Linear and Abstract Algebra
Differential Geometry
Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Mathematics
General Math
Graphs of inverse trigonometric vs inverse hyperbolic functions
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Buzz Bloom, post: 5494366, member: 547865"] Hi Happiness: If your reasoning is the based on the graphs, you need to understand that those graphs are not complete. Given a graph of y = f(x), you can get the inverse graph x = f[SUP]-1[/SUP](y) by reflecting the graph about the main diagonal y=x. As an example, consider the graphs for y = x[SUP]2[/SUP] and x = √y . When you show a graph for x = √y it is comon to ignore the values for negative x, but the negative values are actually part of the graph. x has both + and - values for a given value of y. Regards, Buzz [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Mathematics
General Math
Graphs of inverse trigonometric vs inverse hyperbolic functions
Back
Top