Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Grassmann Integral Question

  1. Oct 11, 2011 #1
    I tried putting this in the math forum, but got no response:

    I can find various derivations of ∫ dθ = 0 which are satisfactory, but none of ∫dθ θ =1.

    Cheng and Li says it's just a normalization convention, of course that assumes that the integral is finite.

    Is this just a matter of definition, or is there a better reason that that?

    Thanks very much !
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 11, 2011 #2
    As far as I remember, it's a definition.
     
  4. Oct 13, 2011 #3
    Thank you.

    The rules for differentiation seems natural enough, and they do seem to give arguments for ∫dθ = 0, but not for ∫dθ θ =1.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Grassmann Integral Question
  1. Grassmann Variables (Replies: 2)

  2. Path integrals (Replies: 12)

Loading...