There is a long standing issue with Gravistars, recent paper here://<![CDATA[ aax_getad_mpb({ "slot_uuid":"f485bc30-20f5-4c34-b261-5f2d6f6142cb" }); //]]>

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0509087

gives a good overview, and has links therein.

One can understand that the 'Gravitational Vacuum Star', above has evolved from a certain paramiters contained in the above paper, for instance ordinary Stellar Stars, have their own intertwined/embedded processes, a [fusion-core] embedded within a [fission-outer shell[fusion-core]fission-outer shell] nuclear structure.

The paper details 'gravistar signals' to be of a certain type.

In this paper:http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0509090

they have extended also has a 'chosen' type of perturbations (waves).

Can both have an underlaying common 'co-incedence' factor?

And thus yet another interesting paper:http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0509088

shows an analytical model of a radiating star undergoing gravitational collapse with non-vanishing shear, interesting papers.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Gravistars ?

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**