Can Intense Light Waves Bend Space-Time to Propel a Vessel Through Space?

In summary, it is theoretically possible to create a wave in space time using intense amounts of light to bend space time and propel a vessel through space. However, this would require the use of mass-energy that violates the averaged null energy condition, and it is not possible to do this with light alone.
  • #1
nitronewt
16
0
Theoretically is it possible to propel a vessel through space by creating a wave in space time using intense amounts of light to bend space time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
High energy densities will bend space-time and generally drag stuff along with it ... eg. if you are in orbit about a planet you get dragged along with the planet. So, in principle, yes.

But I suspect you have an example in mind ... say, that if you use light for this you should get dragged along at the speed of light?

In order for a passing planet to drag you along, it has to be going slow enough to capture you by some mechanism. The same would need to apply to the light. In principle a very dense pulse of light passing you could give you a gravitational tug as it goes by but, considering it is very fast indeed, it won't be able to drag you along. (That's not really explaining properly though - be warned.)

Besides, you'd do better to intercept the light and use the transfer of momentum to push you along.

All this requires the light-source to be someplace else of course.
 
  • #3
So could you then emit a pulse of light from the back of a capsule at a strong enough energy level to propel you forward?
 
  • #4
Of course not - if your ship projected the pulse it would recoil just as hard in the opposite direction.

You could use such an engine in the manner of a rocket though.

Also, did you read the bit about how the light moves too fast to drag you along anyway? The pulse always goes away from you at the speed of light.

The gravitational field due to light is a bit special but the above should be indicative without actually doing the calculation.
 
  • #5
Nitron, if I understand your question, you are essentially asking "can we in principle bend spacetime ahead of a ship so as to propel it"

So Simon's answer, 'in principle', seems right on:

when an object 'falls to earth' it is moving along a curvature in spacetime in just the way I think you are proposing.

I wonder if one could create a higher gravitational potential behind the ship, and a lower relative potential ahead of the ship', if we could also get the ship to 'move along'...fall into that gravitational well...seems again 'in principle' that works.
 
  • #6
Here is a variation on the OP theme:

Had to look up how this was titled: Gravity assist
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_assist

This has ALWAYS seemed to me 'too good to believe' but I guess it works! It is [loosely] a version of gravity propulsion!
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Thank you for the responses. Yes that is precisely what I am talking about. It would seem that if we could create a pulse strong enough to bend space-time in the manner showed by Antiphon's link, it could create a wave in space-time that would propel a ship forward. It seems that it could be a very reliable source of propulsion in the vacuum of space where combustion engines become complicated employing the use of oxidizers and fuels.
 
  • #9
nitronewt said:
It would seem that if we could create a pulse strong enough to bend space-time in the manner showed by Antiphon's link, it could create a wave in space-time that would propel a ship forward.
The problem is creating the expanding part of space-time. It is not possible to do that with ordinary mass-energy (not with light or anything else with positive mass-energy). It is known that to create such a bend in space-time requires mass-energy that violates the averaged null energy condition (Wikipedia- Energy condition). There is nothing that is known to violate this energy condition, but theoretically such things could exist (Arxiv paper on the theoretical violation of said energy condition).

So while, in principle, it may be possible to construct an Alcubierre drive, it cannot be done with light alone.
 
  • #10
... even if you did get the exotic matter - you'd still need to get the pulse to propagate ... so it is still more like firing your pulse from something and hitching a ride.
 

1. What is gravitational propulsion?

Gravitational propulsion is a theoretical method of space travel that utilizes the force of gravity to propel a spacecraft without the need for traditional rocket propulsion systems.

2. How does gravitational propulsion work?

Gravitational propulsion works by utilizing the gravitational pull of celestial bodies, such as planets or stars, to accelerate a spacecraft. This can be achieved through techniques such as slingshot maneuvers or using the gravitational pull of a planet to assist in the spacecraft's acceleration.

3. What are the potential benefits of gravitational propulsion?

The potential benefits of gravitational propulsion include reduced fuel consumption, faster travel times, and the ability to explore deeper into space. It also has the potential to make space travel more cost-effective and sustainable.

4. Are there any current applications of gravitational propulsion?

Gravitational propulsion is still a theoretical concept and has not yet been implemented in any spacecraft. However, certain aspects of gravitational propulsion, such as slingshot maneuvers, have been used in past space missions to increase speed and conserve fuel.

5. What are some challenges and limitations of gravitational propulsion?

One of the main challenges of gravitational propulsion is accurately calculating and predicting the gravitational forces of celestial bodies. Other limitations include the need for precise timing and positioning, potential risks to astronauts, and the need for advanced technology and resources to implement this method of propulsion.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
868
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
842
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
764
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
862
Back
Top