Gravity as a resultant force?

  • Thread starter RobComer
  • Start date
  • #1
2
0
If gravity is miniscule compared to the other three interactions, could it be a kind of resultant 'force' left over from balancing the strong, weak and electromagnetic interactions? One which is then much more detectable on the larger scale, when all these tiny gravitational forces from each atom combine.
Is this a 'high school' over simplification and if so, where do I start to unravel this mystery?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
arivero
Gold Member
3,345
88
Note that 1) it is additive, the more mass you put, the more strong the force is. And 2) it goes as the inverse square. Such properties are not typical of residual forces.

Said that, the study of residual forces is interesting. Van der Waals etc. Also, in some sense you could look at tidal force as a residual, as it appears after you have substracted the "point-like body" gravity.
 
  • #3
2
0
Thanks for the help on this one!! Is it possible to detect gravity at the scale of individual atoms? So, would you be able measure it for (let's say) one atom of carbon and then for a known number in an allotrope like graphite? Would the measurement be directly proportional to the number of atoms you had? Or, are we talking about something that as yet can't be measured at this scale?
 
  • #4
ZapperZ
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
35,847
4,676
Thanks for the help on this one!! Is it possible to detect gravity at the scale of individual atoms? So, would you be able measure it for (let's say) one atom of carbon and then for a known number in an allotrope like graphite? Would the measurement be directly proportional to the number of atoms you had? Or, are we talking about something that as yet can't be measured at this scale?

http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2981
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/3525

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
891
98
RobComer said:
Is it possible to detect gravity at the scale of individual atoms?
The earth's gravitational field can be detected by observing it's affect on an individual atom (the links provided by ZapperZ), but the gravitational field that an individual atom produces cannot be detected. The former is called the passive gravitational mass of the atom and the latter is called the active gravitational mass of the atom. The active force of gravity is far too weak to measure at this scale. You can use Newton's universal law of gravitation to calculate it.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
138
0
Thanks for the help on this one!! Is it possible to detect gravity at the scale of individual atoms? So, would you be able measure it for (let's say) one atom of carbon and then for a known number in an allotrope like graphite? Would the measurement be directly proportional to the number of atoms you had? Or, are we talking about something that as yet can't be measured at this scale?

Theoretically it would be possible to detect the gravitation between individual atoms, but not practically. Our instruments are nowhere near that sensitive and precise.

And no, the mass of a compound is different than the sum of the masses of its component atoms, because there is some mass defect due to the chemical bonds. This is because mass is not conserved, it is an artifact of something else. We don't really understand much about this.
 

Related Threads on Gravity as a resultant force?

  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
2K
G
  • Last Post
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
863
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
40
Views
18K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
Top