Gravity + Electric field

In summary: Ed = 1/2mv^2 + 0 + 1/2kx^2 + 01. the - sign, I'm not sure where I got that from. 2. the KE term, I though I needed it because it was considering the energy at the lowest point, which would be 0 if at rest. mgh + 0 + 0 +q_o Ed = 0 + 0 + 1/2kx^2 + 0-Ed= -1/2kx^22Ed= kx^2x= sqrt(2Ed/k)Okay, let's go
  • #1
~christina~
Gold Member
714
0

Homework Statement


On a certain planet, the acceleration dute to gravity is the same as that on Earth but there is a strong downward electrical field with the field being uniform close to the planet's surface. The magnitude of this electric field is E= 4.75x10^5N/C. A 1.00kg mass carrying a charge of [tex]100\mu C[/tex] is connected to a vertical spring for which the spring constant is 200N/m. The spring is not stretched when the mass is released from rest.

a) by what maximum amount does the spring expand?
b) What is the equillibrium postition of the mass
c) show that the mass executes simple harmonic motion

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]E= 4.75x10^5 N/C[/tex]
[tex]m= 100kg[/tex]
[tex]q= 100\muC [/tex]
[tex]k= 200N/m[/tex]
[tex]g= 9.8m/s^2 [/tex]

hm..I would think that the downward gravitational field would make the force pushing a person or mass down would be greater.

sort of lost here.

Can someone help? Thanks

I was thinking that well there is force downward on the spring that is initially unstretched but this Fy is composed of electric field and gravity so:

E= F/q
I think I can find the force since the E is given and the q is given right?

Then would I just add that to the gravitational force?

and then use that on spring as in F=-kx since I would have the force ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What's the issue? You have all your steps laid out, why don't you do it? Have a little faith in yourself, especially when you have no problems in your logic.

P.S: q is not 200. Might just be a mis-type but that would be one huge charge ^^
 
  • #3
Nabeshin said:
What's the issue? You have all your steps laid out, why don't you do it? Have a little faith in yourself, especially when you have no problems in your logic.

P.S: q is not 200. Might just be a mis-type but that would be one huge charge ^^

I said k was 200...never said q was 200.

see the thing is that it's not really the first step that is the problem usually it's the 2nd and and 3rd step that have me like this :uhh:
 
  • #4
Mistake, I meant 100. In your "attempt at solution" it says q=100, which should be 100*10^-6. Oh and you wrote m=100kg, which should be 1kg lol.
 
  • #5
[tex]q= 100x10^-6 C [/tex]

a and

[tex]m= 1.00kg[/tex]

alright so...if I did the problem like I said I would then I would get:

E=F/q

F=Eq

F= (4.75x10^5 N/C) (1.00x10^-6C)= .475N

and the force due to gravity equals

F=mg

F= 1.00kg(9.8m/s^2)= 9.8N

[tex]F_{total}= .475N + 9.8N= 10.275N[/tex]

and that would be put into

F=-kx

10.275 N/(200N/m)= x

x=5.1375x10^-2 m

but as to finding 2 is it using the fact that when a object is at equillibrium that v=0?

Thanks
 
  • #6
Actually, that's the equilibrium position you found. Equilibrium is defined as when the sum of the forces and torques is equal to zero. However, because of good old Newton's first, the object will continue moving through this point. Consider the work the forces (downward, constant forces) and spring (changing force) will do and the point at which v=0 is the maximum displacement.
 
  • #7
~christina~ said:
[tex]q= 100x10^-6 C [/tex]

a and

[tex]m= 1.00kg[/tex]

alright so...if I did the problem like I said I would then I would get:

E=F/q

F=Eq

F= (4.75x10^5 N/C) (1.00x10^-6C)= .475N
Check that value for charge.

and the force due to gravity equals

F=mg

F= 1.00kg(9.8m/s^2)= 9.8N
OK.
[tex]F_{total}= .475N + 9.8N= 10.275N[/tex]

and that would be put into

F=-kx

10.275 N/(200N/m)= x

x=5.1375x10^-2 m

but as to finding 2 is it using the fact that when a object is at equillibrium that v=0?
As Nabeshin points out, here you have calculated the equilibrium position (measured from the starting point), which is the point where the net force is zero.

Use energy conservation to solve for the lowest point--that's the point where v = 0.
 
  • #8
fixed

[tex]q= 100x10^-6 C [/tex]

a and

[tex]m= 1.00kg[/tex]

alright so...if I did the problem like I said I would then I would get:

E=F/q

F=Eq

F= (4.75x10^5 N/C) (100x10^-6C)= 47.5N

and the force due to gravity equals

F=mg

F= 1.00kg(9.8m/s^2)= 9.8N

[tex]F_{total}= 47.5N + 9.8N= 57.3[/tex]

and that would be put into

F=-kx

57.3N/(200N/m)= x

x=2.865x10^-1 m

__________________
a)

for the conservation of energy I'd say that...at max displacement
PE= 1/2kA^2
KE= 0
x= A

initial it's

[tex]PE_i + KE_i + PE_si= KE_f + PE_f + PE_sf[/tex]

[tex]mgh + 0 + 0= 1/2mv^2 + 0 + 1/2kx^2[/tex]

right or not?
 
  • #9
Don't forget electric potential energy.
 
  • #10
DavidWhitbeck said:
Don't forget electric potential energy.


[tex]PE_i + KE_i + PE_si+ PE_ei= KE_f + PE_f + PE_sf+ PE_ei[/tex]

[tex]mgh + 0 + 0 + q_o \Delta V = 1/2mv^2 + 0 + 1/2kx^2[/tex]

is that right? not sure how the equation for potential Electrical Energy would look if in the conservation of energy equation.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
  • #11
The electric field is uniform, but you're using the PE associated with the field of a point mass.
 
  • #12
DavidWhitbeck said:
The electric field is uniform, but you're using the PE associated with the field of a point mass.

so..is it fine now?

[tex]mgh + 0 + 0 -q_o Ed = 1/2mv^2 + 0 + 1/2kx^2 + 0[/tex]

Thanks
 
Last edited:
  • #13
~christina~ said:
[tex]mgh + 0 + 0 -q_o Ed = 1/2mv^2 + 0 + 1/2kx^2 + 0[/tex]
I assume you're solving part a? So you're comparing the energy at the point of release with the energy at the lowest point.

(1) Why is the electrical PE negative? The electric force points downward, just like gravity.
(2) Why is there a KE term on the right? At the lowest point, the speed is zero. (If it wasn't zero, that means it would still be moving down and thus not yet at the lowest point.)

Be sure to express the distances in terms of the same variable. I see h, d, and x: all you need is one.
 
  • #14
Doc Al said:
I assume you're solving part a? So you're comparing the energy at the point of release with the energy at the lowest point.

(1) Why is the electrical PE negative? The electric force points downward, just like gravity.
(2) Why is there a KE term on the right? At the lowest point, the speed is zero. (If it wasn't zero, that means it would still be moving down and thus not yet at the lowest point.)

Be sure to express the distances in terms of the same variable. I see h, d, and x: all you need is one.

okay, trying to fix this based on what you said.

[tex]mgd + q_o Ed + 1/2mv^2 = 1/2kd^2 [/tex]

about the electric field: how would I determine if it is possitive or negative?
 
  • #15
~christina~ said:
okay, trying to fix this based on what you said.

[tex]mgd + q_o Ed + 1/2mv^2 = 1/2kd^2 [/tex]
Almost there: It's released from rest.

about the electric field: how would I determine if it is possitive or negative?
You are told that the field is downward and the charge is positive (I assume), so the electric force acts downward just like gravity.
 
  • #16
Doc Al said:
Almost there: It's released from rest.
hm...

[tex]mgd + q_o Ed = 1/2kd^2 [/tex]

You are told that the field is downward and the charge is positive (I assume), so the electric force acts downward just like gravity.
so if the charge is negative, would that just make the sign negative since it would go up instead of downwards?
 
  • #17
okay I don't know how to show that something executes simple harmonic motion.

need help on that last part.

Thank you
 
  • #18
~christina~ said:
[tex]mgd + q_o Ed = 1/2kd^2 [/tex]
Good. Now you can solve for d.

so if the charge is negative, would that just make the sign negative since it would go up instead of downwards?
Right.

~christina~ said:
okay I don't know how to show that something executes simple harmonic motion.
Show that the restoring force is proportional to displacement from equilibrium. (Like a spring obeying Hooke's law: F = -kx.)
 
  • #19
Doc Al said:
Good. Now you can solve for d.

[tex]mgd + q_o Ed = 1/2kd^2 [/tex]

um...well I seem to have issues with finding the d but I got this far..

(1.00kg)(9.8m/s^2)d +(100x10^-6C)(4.75x10^5 N/C)d= 1/2(200N/m)(d)^2
9.8Nd + 47.5Nd= 100N/m d^2

100N/m d^2 - 57.3d= 0

(I know I factor but I'm not sure what number to factor with for this...for example if it is
2x^2-4x= 0 then the equation would be factored to 2x(x-2)= 0 and thus 2x=0 or x-2= 0 and answer would be 2)

Show that the restoring force is proportional to displacement from equilibrium. (Like a spring obeying Hooke's law: F = -kx.)

"restoring force"

wouldn't that be hooke's law, though?
(didn't really get it in class and can't find it online)

I'm being told to draw it but for a exam I don't think it would be acceptable to draw.

Thanks.
 
  • #20
anyone? :smile:
 
  • #21
~christina~ said:
[tex]mgd + q_o Ed = 1/2kd^2 [/tex]

um...well I seem to have issues with finding the d but I got this far..

(1.00kg)(9.8m/s^2)d +(100x10^-6C)(4.75x10^5 N/C)d= 1/2(200N/m)(d)^2
9.8Nd + 47.5Nd= 100N/m d^2

100N/m d^2 - 57.3d= 0

(I know I factor but I'm not sure what number to factor with for this...for example if it is
2x^2-4x= 0 then the equation would be factored to 2x(x-2)= 0 and thus 2x=0 or x-2= 0 and answer would be 2)
Hint: Just divide all terms by d.



"restoring force"

wouldn't that be hooke's law, though?
(didn't really get it in class and can't find it online)

I'm being told to draw it but for a exam I don't think it would be acceptable to draw.

Thanks.
Write the force as a function of vertical displacement. Then show it has a form that matches Hooke's law: F = -kx.
 
  • #22
In your equation you can factor out a d so either d=0 or the other thing.

To show that the restoring force is proportional to displacement, just derive a force equation, and if it has an x term in it, that's shown.
 
  • #23
Doc Al said:
Hint: Just divide all terms by d.
alright...got confused there.

so...
100N/m d^2 - 57.3d= 0

d(100d-57.3)= 0
d=0
d=0.573m

Write the force as a function of vertical displacement. Then show it has a form that matches Hooke's law: F = -kx.
I know that there's the F=mg (gravitational force on the object)
then it has the Spring force F=-kx which is directed in the opposite direction from the gravitational force.

I think those are the only forces but there is also the electric field force, which is

[tex]\sum Fy= mg-kx[/tex]

and I'm not sure now what to do.

Thanks
 
  • #24
~christina~ said:
alright...got confused there.

so...
100N/m d^2 - 57.3d= 0

d(100d-57.3)= 0
d=0
d=0.573m
Good.


I know that there's the F=mg (gravitational force on the object)
then it has the Spring force F=-kx which is directed in the opposite direction from the gravitational force.

I think those are the only forces but there is also the electric field force, which is

[tex]\sum Fy= mg-kx[/tex]

and I'm not sure now what to do.

Thanks
Add in the electric force to get the total force on the mass. You need to show that this force is proportional to the displacement from equilibrium and oppositely directed. Hints: Write the total force expression. Change variables to write the position as a function of displacement from equilibrium (call it y, if you like). You found the equilibrium position in part b; use it. (Use it symbolically, not with numbers.)
 

1. What is the relationship between gravity and electric field?

The relationship between gravity and electric field is that both are fundamental forces in nature. Gravity is a force of attraction between objects with mass, while electric field is a force between electrically charged particles. Both forces are described by mathematical equations and can influence the motion of objects.

2. How does gravity affect electric fields?

Gravity does not directly affect electric fields. However, the presence of mass can cause the curvature of space-time, which can indirectly influence the behavior of electric fields in that region. This is known as the theory of general relativity.

3. Can electric fields affect gravity?

Yes, electric fields can affect gravity. This is known as the Coulomb force, which describes the attraction or repulsion between two charged particles. In certain scenarios, the electric field can be strong enough to overcome the force of gravity.

4. How do scientists study the interaction between gravity and electric fields?

Scientists use various methods, such as experiments, mathematical models, and simulations, to study the interaction between gravity and electric fields. They also use tools such as accelerometers and electric field meters to measure and analyze the effects of these forces.

5. What are the practical applications of understanding gravity and electric fields?

Understanding the interaction between gravity and electric fields is crucial in many fields, including physics, engineering, and astronomy. It helps us explain and predict natural phenomena, such as the behavior of celestial bodies and the functioning of electronic devices. This knowledge has also led to technologies like GPS and satellite communication.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
31
Views
970
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
733
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
988
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
877
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
730
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
176
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
325
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
635
Back
Top