Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Gravity measurement

  1. May 30, 2008 #1
    Someone repeated the Cavendish experiment at about 0 K?

    My question: the gravity force is costant when mass is near 0 Kelvin?

    It is possible a weakening of G, a 'transition phase'?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 30, 2008 #2

    ZapperZ

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    Can you please give an exact, valid reference to this?

    All previous measurements of the Newtonian gravitational law has been verified up to micron scale. See experiments coming out of the Adelberg's group out of the U. of Washington.

    Or see this experiment:

    https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1059881&postcount=15

    Zz.
     
    Last edited: May 30, 2008
  4. May 30, 2008 #3
    I'm not speaking about distances but about temperature.
    I contacted several physicists, MAGIA group also, but no answer.

    My point: to repeat the Cavendish experiment (torsion balance) to measure the force of gravity between masses at temperature near 0 K or less than 2,7 Kelvin at least.

    Instead of solid metallic spheres to put containers filled of liquid helium.

    To be more precise: the mass has a gravity force of attraction stable or variable referring to the temperature?

    I searched around the net but I find out nothing about this, there are gravimeters using masses of superconductor but they operate at temperature far above 0 K.
     
  5. May 30, 2008 #4

    D H

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Riley Newman at Univ. of California, Irvine uses cryogenics temperatures to reduce some of the errors inherent in assessing G, whose uncertainty is very large compared to most other physical constants.

    From http://www.physics.uci.edu/gravity/
     
  6. May 30, 2008 #5

    ZapperZ

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    The use of cryogenics would only eliminate thermal noise from the measurement. I don't see how it would affect anything fundamental out of such an experiment, as pointed out by DH's reference.

    Zz.
     
  7. May 30, 2008 #6

    D H

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Any experiment is burdened with plant (or process) noise and measurement noise. Cryogenics should reduce both. Process noise in this case includes thermal vibrations in the torsion bar. Riley is also using cryogenics to reduce friction. I don't know how he is accomplishing this through the use of cryogenics and I don't know why this cannot be accomplished by some other means.

    The universal gravitational constant is known to five significant digits. This is very low resolution compared to most other physical constants. The stated goal of Riley's group is 2 parts per million, or close to two orders of magnitude improvement.
     
  8. May 30, 2008 #7

    rbj

    User Avatar

    i thought they said 20 ppm. nonetheless, that would be a big deal. maybe, someday, the powers that be will redefine the SI base units of length, time, mass, and charge to all be some constant multiples of the respective Planck units (but not until we get a much better handle on the value of G). that should drive the point home to the "varying-G" proponents.
     
  9. May 30, 2008 #8
    In the Riley's apparatus the balance torsion operate at criogenic temperature but the copper masses are not at crio temperature.

    In yours opinions it is possible to carry out the G measurement with copper masses at crio temperature or sobstitute the copper masses with an He masses at crio temperature?

    In other words: mass has the same G force at near 0 K?
     
  10. May 30, 2008 #9

    ZapperZ

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    Why shouldn't it? And this better not have any hint of the Podkletnov effect.

    Zz.
     
  11. May 30, 2008 #10

    D H

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Google search results: Your search - Podkletnov site:physics.uci.edu - did not match any documents.

    Why crogenic? From http://www.physics.uci.edu/gravity/papers/Rome06.pdf:
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?