Great one-liners from PF members

  • Thread starter sysprog
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Members
And to obtain just one arsenic atom, you would need to buy 285 million one ounce bottles!There's also the fact that anyone prescribing homeopathic medicine should be required to accept homeopathic payment which of course is an empty envelope that... doesn't really exist.f
  • #526
We already have it in French. :-p
Well dang. I've had this happen before. Last time it was Apocalypso. Someday soon anything you can imagine will already be there. Then what?

A ChatLSD search turned up the Charles Schwab brokerage. Who knew?

There was a ChatLSD on Instagram that has been removed.
 
Last edited:
  • #528
This process of continually updating one's knowledge of a subject is called learning. It's the opposite of religiously adhering to an established view in the face of evidence to the contrary.
 
  • Like
Likes Flyboy, berkeman, Hornbein and 3 others
  • #529
... if only there were some way of searching for information on the internet :wink:
This deserves to be in this thread in its own right, yeah?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman, phinds, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #530
PeroK said
This process of continually updating one's knowledge of a subject is called learning. It's the opposite of religiously adhering to an established view in the face of evidence to the contrary.
I might borrow this one, if you don't mind.

-Dan
 
  • #531
This deserves to be in this thread in its own right, yeah?
That was my complaint about the title "Breaking bad."
 
  • #533
In a discussion about a woman who had 69 children from 27 pregnancies (all multiple births):
27 x .75 = 20.25 years
That so much more reasonable.
Very fertile, but also efficient.
 
  • #534
About questionable results in a new paper:

At least it puts the woo in woo hoo.

:smile:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Tom.G, BillTre and topsquark
  • #535
When trying to help an EE student with analyzing fairly simple circuits, and they keep trying to use SPICE to guide their learning...

You'll learn a lot more about electronics if you solve simple circuits with math before you simulate them. Simulations only give you answers, not reasons.
 
  • #536
As a rule of thumb, when the first thing someone tells you is that their invention isn't a perpetual motion machine (before you can even think to ask), that means it's a perpetual motion machine.
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN, Bystander, pinball1970 and 4 others
  • #537
That sounds like a conversation that could go on forever.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes BillTre and berkeman
  • #538
There is no universal Least Action path to happiness.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50, berkeman and BillTre
  • #539
This one is way over my head... :smile:

The fact that you can buy an oven mitt at all is proof of quantum mechanics.
 
  • #540
There is an explanation in that thread.
 
  • #541
From a thread where a math major is complaining that when he had to take a mandatory Physics course, he found the math in it to be very non-rigorous and not based on axioms...

Do you already know what the axioms of nature are?
 
  • #542
While trying to give a B-level reply to a question about the speed of propagation of changes in spacetime...

It's actually quite difficult to come up with a well-defined way of saying what you are trying to say without either resorting to postgrad maths or saying something not really accurate and crossing your fingers behind your back and hoping nobody asks awkward questions.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and Ibix
  • #543
From a thread where a math major is complaining that when he had to take a mandatory Physics course, he found the math in it to be very non-rigorous and not based on axioms...

From the very same thread:
I guarantee any stroke QM could give a mathematician, an engineer could make worse.
 
  • Haha
Likes DrClaude and DaveE
  • #544
From a thread discussing WiFi and Routers, @Vanadium 50 observed:

The number on the box is really mostly irrelevant. "Up to X Mbps" just means that they promise you won't get X+1.
 
  • #545
Vanadium on a post regarding David McCallum TV series.

The Invisible man" 1975 series
V50 "I could never see him in that role."
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes BillTre and DennisN
  • #546
I could never see him in that role.
Not to be outdone our talented, the lovely,our very own @DennisN !!



"Also, as far as I can remember, the portrayal of the character was rather transparent."
 

Suggested for: Great one-liners from PF members

Replies
4
Views
700
Replies
3
Views
733
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
641
Replies
8
Views
491
Replies
199
Views
13K
Replies
8
Views
595
Replies
6
Views
624
Replies
1
Views
562
Back
Top