hello all(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I know this might be a simple question to ask, but i want to find other ways of proving it anyway here we go

propve that if A is a subset of R and is non empty and bounded below, then it has a greatest lower bound.

This is how i did it:

let b be a lower bound of A. then for every a an element of A b<=a so -a<=-b. now we notice that -b is an upper bound for -A, where -A={-x,x an element ofA}. since -A is non empty and it is bounded above then by the least upper bound axiom -A has a least upper bound , lets call this least upper bound -L , since -L is the least upper bound of -A, we must have -L<=-b or b<=L. and so this is true for any b which is a lower bound of A and hence L must be the greatest lower bound of A

is there another method to do this problem if not is there anyway of simplyfying this proof?

thanxs

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Greatest lower bound

Loading...

Similar Threads - Greatest lower bound | Date |
---|---|

Definite integral of greatest integer function | Mar 17, 2015 |

Greatest Rate of Angle Change | Feb 28, 2013 |

One Sided Limits of Greatest Integer Function | Sep 10, 2012 |

Greatest lower bound/least upper bound in Q | Nov 11, 2011 |

Max, min, least upper, and greatest lower bound for sets question | Oct 23, 2004 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**