- #1
- 117
- 0
:surprised Note: Please See thread "Greatest Physicist Redux.":surprised
Last edited:
This is a joke right ?
http://britneyspears.ac/
This is a joke right ?
http://britneyspears.ac/
Uhm... we would still miss Faraday :uhh:If I could change the poll I would replace Rutherford with him.
Interesting how Einstein hasn't gotten any votes so far.
These kind of topics are useless and there will always be missing physicist.
These kind of topics are useless and there will always be missing physicist.
But it's quite funny to even ask the question :tongue:These kind of topics are useless and there will always be missing physicist.
Where's the only physicist to have won the Nobel Prize in physics twice?
Do we have a Nobel prize who also is a Field medalist ?Where's the only physicist to have won the Nobel Prize in physics twice?
Do we have a Nobel prize who also is a Field medalist ?
I thought Witten might become one. In any case, that would be tremendous an achievement.Not that I know of. Anyone know of any?
You are missing the point. Newton would not be who he is without Galileo. And Einstein also sits on the shoulders of giants.If only I could list more than 10 options, I would include all of the physicists talked about so far!
Even if I could, I still think Newton would win though...
Ah, Brian David Josephson wins my heart.
You are missing the point. Newton would not be who he is without Galileo. And Einstein also sits on the shoulders of giants.
You are missing the point. Newton would not be who he is without Galileo. And Einstein also sits on the shoulders of giants.
I was mainly having funI don't know much about physicists, why do you say that?
On the shoulders yesIf you go by that rationale, you would also have to say Galileo sat on Aristotle or Plato.
On the shoulders yes![]()
I never knew them personnaly,
:[/QUOTE]and considering philosopher's occupations in greek antiquity, maybe you are right :tongue2: