Greatest physicist of all time?

Who was the greatest physicist?


  • Total voters
    77
  • #1
Who do you think was/is the greatest physicist who ever lived and why?
In my opinion #1 has to go to Newton, with Einstein and Feynman coming joint second. Newton started it all off, while Einstein and Feynman created a public face for science.
If the physicist you want is not in the poll, then say who it is and why in a post.
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
9,970
132
Hmm..I'm not much in favour of rankings like this, but if I must choose, I'd say Archimedes.
 
  • #3
mezarashi
Homework Helper
650
0
I think Newton is the 'nerdiest' you can go for a physicist. One man show, let's invent the math when it doesn't exist just can't be beat in my opinion.
 
  • #4
mezarashi said:
I think Newton is the 'nerdiest' you can go for a physicist. One man show, let's invent the math when it doesn't exist just can't be beat in my opinion.
Exactly, this is why it is very hard to see past Newton as the greatest physicist ever.
 
  • #5
17
0
newton is no physicist, he is more a mathematican. whatever he proved of physics has been of significance only to the earths atmosphere, to this surrounding. and never proved anyhting that accounts to the true property of matter. but his mathematical theories sounds quite universal. his theories of motion are all based on practical materials and not on thoerotical basis so he only proved right what occurs in our surrounding and not beyond it. physics is more a theorotical science, isnt it? i account einstien's theorotical expanadings should be given some credit. he is the best. :approve:
 
  • #6
574
0
debeng said:
physics is more a theorotical science, isnt it? :
NO! A gazillion experimental physicists disagree with you and quite a few theorists too. Including Einstein himself.
 
  • #7
17
0
i never said it is not a practical one?

inha said:
NO! A gazillion experimental physicists disagree with you and quite a few theorists too. Including Einstein himself.
i apologize for the direct way of saying it. but yet everything has a philosophical approach, and i believe exploring physics has its too. i think mathemtics is just another side of language. we have created mathematics the same way we have created language. they are the means we explore everything in science and our minds. but we never create physics for it exist on its own.
 
  • #8
6,265
1,280
I used to think Newton, but I've changed my mind since I learned a bit about Galileo. I think Galileo was up against a world where there were more outrageously erroneous notions firmly in place than there have ever been since. It's amazing how much he did discover given that most of his energy had to be diverted to tedious arguments about extremely fundamental, obvious points, like the rate of fall of objects of dissimilar weight.
 
  • #9
PerennialII
Science Advisor
Gold Member
898
0
.... one hybrid of Newton & Einstein with a shake of Galileo please.
 
  • #10
295
0
einstein was so revolutionary in his way of thinking. people still do not really understand the observations of that man. newton was a simple physicist, with great ingenuity, but not so much creative thought as einstein, it appears.

it is very difficult for me to think of newton as a genius... more of a technician.

einstein on the other hand, was creative genius... absolutely unequaled by newton.

then again, einstein couldn't have done it without newton, so it's fair that newton takes the cake, and that einstein "follow in his steps" so to speak.
 
  • #11
Mk
1,984
3
PerennialII said:
.... one hybrid of Newton & Einstein with a shake of Galileo please.
An omniscient being...
 
  • #12
345
1
I think physics itself is too diverse in its subjects to choose a single 'greatest' physicist. Having said that, i'll try to answer it, but in a more specific way.
Experimental physics: Bardeen
Theoretical: Einstein
General: Newton
 
  • #13
PerennialII
Science Advisor
Gold Member
898
0
... think Einstein could have taken a lesson from Newton about methods of working (a snip of Newton's "somewhat" bizarre work ethics .... or mania is probably a better word).
 
  • #14
3,763
9
Bohr, Dirac or Planck... In short, the QM-buddies

QM is far more usefull to us (and far more beautiful and elegant a theory than GR ever will be). After QM, classical physics comes second on the list of important, ingenious and usefull physics and GR closes the list.

regards
marlon

EDIT : the only thing Einstein ever did was formulating the equivalence principle, that is all.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
3,763
9
Bladibla said:
Experimental physics: Bardeen
Huh :confused:

How's that ?

regards
marlon
 
  • #16
Lisa!
Gold Member
612
96
Einstein! I just feel more comfortable with him than the others! :biggrin:
 
  • #17
rachmaninoff
What about Santa Claus? He modified GR to accomodate for FTL travel. Einstein never thought of that!

:wink:
 
  • #18
3,763
9
Lisa! said:
Einstein! I just feel more comfortable with him than the others! :biggrin:
I checked the poll and yes, you actually voted for Einstein. Can you please tell me why ?

marlon
 
  • #19
MathematicalPhysicist
Gold Member
4,324
224
i would have to say, that if god exists then he would have to be the greatest physicist of all time.
:surprised :rofl:
 
  • #20
why is heisenberg not on the list and we also cannot ignore ancient scientists like Aristotle whose theories remained supreme for thousands of yrs
 
  • #21
695
6
desiguy8179 said:
why is heisenberg not on the list and we also cannot ignore ancient scientists like Aristotle whose theories remained supreme for thousands of yrs
yeah those theories were wrong longer than any others
 
  • #22
6,265
1,280
tribdog said:
yeah those theories were wrong longer than any others
I call him "The Father of all Crackpots".
 
  • #23
740
13
how do i change my vote to galileo? he (& descartes & kepler i think) was was of the people who started the 'mathematicization' science, which imo was/is the most important development in the history of science.
 
  • #24
3,763
9
desiguy8179 said:
why is heisenberg not on the list and we also cannot ignore ancient scientists like Aristotle whose theories remained supreme for thousands of yrs
INDEED:approve:

Or what about Aristarchus, the real and only founder of "heliocentrism".

You know, this is what happens with polls that have only been constructed based upon "popular beliefs". "Everybody" asses Einstein to be the greatest:yuck: scientist of all time, but 95% of these voters do not even know why. They do not know the work of Heisenberg, Bohr, Planck, Dirac, Bardeen, ...Hell, they do not even know what Einsteins work really is about or what PART of Special/General Relativity actually comes from Einstein HIMSELF!!!!!!!!!

marlon
 
  • #25
EL
Science Advisor
547
0
I miss Schwinger and Weinberg...
 

Related Threads on Greatest physicist of all time?

Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
9K
  • Poll
  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Poll
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Poll
  • Last Post
4
Replies
93
Views
19K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
46
Views
21K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
25
Views
5K
Top